Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023
Nurses' preferences for the format of care planning clinical decision support coded with standardized nursing languages.
Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capabilities of computerized decision support systems supporting the nursing process in hospital settings: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The mChoice App, an mHealth Tool for the Monitoring of Preexposure Prophylaxis Adherence and Sexual Behaviors in Young Men Who Have Sex With Men: Usability Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Application and assessment of NNN linkages in liver transplant postoperative care: a prospective study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Standardized nursing terminologies come of age: advancing quality of care, population health, and health equity across the care continuum.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current electronic health records (EHRs) are often ineffective in identifying patient priorities and care needs requiring nurses to search a large volume of text to find clinically meaningful information. Our study, part of a larger randomized controlled trial testing nursing care planning clinical decision support coded in standardized nursing languages, focuses on identifying format preferences after random assignment and interaction to 1 of 3 formats (text only, text+table, text+graph). Being assigned to the text+graph significantly increased the preference for graph (P = .02) relative to other groups. Being assigned to the text only (P = .06) and text+table (P = .35) was not significantly associated with preference for their assigned formats. Additionally, the preference for graphs was not significantly associated with understanding graph content (P = .19). Further studies are needed to enhance our understanding of how format preferences influence the use and processing of displayed information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.