ArticleDementia and geriatric cognitive disorders2023
Evaluation of a Dementia Training Course for Staff of a Center of Dementia Care.
Article in Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Examining the Impact of LEADInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLiterature shows poor dementia training and competencies among health and social professionals. Due to the growing prevalence of people with dementia and all the related care demands, specialized training is increasingly needed but must be effective in terms of impact on knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes. We aimed to analyze the impact of a first-level dementia training course for staff of a new specialized center for people with dementia, considering the first three levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework, namely, staff reaction (satisfaction), skills and learning (knowledge and dementia attitudes), and behavior changes.
methodsThis is a single-center group pre-post design study of a 12-session online course. An online questionnaire was administered to measure satisfaction, expectations, knowledge/learning, attitudes (Dementia Attitude Scale), and new behaviors/practices. We compared perceived knowledge (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and attitudes (paired t test). Thematic analysis explored new behaviors/practices.
resultsEighty-five professionals and 1 volunteer were included (median age 31, 92% female). Satisfaction with the training was high (median 4/5). Perceived knowledge improved (median 3-4; p < 0.001). The knowledge test median score was 70.8%. After training, participants showed better attitudes toward dementia (mean 116.5, SD 10.3, to mean 122.2, SD 11.5; p < 0.001). Most (93%) said their behavior/practice changed. Thematic analysis yielded four new behavior/practice dimensions: care provision/interaction, communication, family/caregivers, and self-confidence.
conclusionsThe course improved all dimensions evaluated, suggesting it effectively provides first-level dementia training. This may be transferable to similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.