Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37257352›Full record

ArticleAtherosclerosis2023

The role of endothelial shear stress, shear stress gradient, and plaque topography in plaque erosion.

Diaa Hakim, Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri, Ahmet U Coskun, Zhongyue Pu, Olli A Kajander, Deborah Rupert, Charles Maynard, Nicholas Cefalo, Gerasimos Siasos, Michail I Papafaklis and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atherosclerosis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathogenesis of plaque erosion.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Risk Factors Favoring Plaque Erosion.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Coronary Plaque Erosion: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Diaa HakimCardiovascular Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Natalia Pinilla-EcheverriMcMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Ahmet U CoskunDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Zhongyue PuDepartment of Medical Science, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Olli A KajanderHeart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Deborah RupertMedical Scientist Training Program, Stonybrook University, New York, NY, USA.
Charles MaynardDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicholas CefaloCardiovascular Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gerasimos SiasosNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Michail I PapafaklisCardiology Department, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Stefanu KostasCardiology Department, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Lampros K MichalisCardiology Department, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Sanjit JollyMcMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Shamir R MehtaMcMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Tej ShethMcMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Kevin CroceCardiovascular Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter H StoneCardiovascular Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: pstone@bwh.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USUniversity of Ioannina · GRMcMaster University · CABrigham and Women's Hospital · USHamilton Health Sciences · CANagoya University · JPNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRNortheastern University · USPopulation Health Research Institute · CAStony Brook University · USTampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Unique value of real-time shear stress to enhance coronary disease managementR01HL140498 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STONE, PETER HOWARD, TEARNEY, GUILLERMO J · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
Integrating Coronary Atherosclerosis with Physiologic Features for Optimized Risk StratificationR01HL146144 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MIN, JAMES K, STONE, PETER HOWARD · 2021 to 2024
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL140498NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPlaque erosion is a common underlying cause of acute coronary syndromes. The role of endothelial shear stress (ESS) and endothelial shear stress gradient (ESSG) in plaque erosion remains unknown. We aimed to determine the role of ESS metrics and maximum plaque slope steepness in plaques with erosion versus stable plaques.

methodsThis analysis included 46 patients/plaques from TOTAL and COMPLETE trials and Brigham and Women's Hospital's database who underwent angiography and OCT. Plaques were divided into those with erosion (n = 24) and matched stable coronary plaques (n = 22). Angiographic views were used to generate a 3-D arterial reconstruction, with centerlines merged from angiography and OCT pullback. Local ESS metrics were assessed by computational fluid dynamics. Among plaque erosions, the up- and down-slope (Δ lumen area/frame) was calculated for each culprit plaque.

resultsCompared with stable plaque controls, plaques with an erosion were associated with higher max ESS (8.3 ± 4.8 vs. 5.0 ± 1.9 Pa, p = 0.02) and max ESSG any direction (9.2 ± 7.5 vs. 4.3 ± 3.11 Pa/mm, p = 0.005). Proximal erosion was associated with a steeper plaque upslope while distal erosion with a steeper plaque downslope. Max ESS and Max ESSG any direction were independent factors in the development of plaque erosion (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.06-1.65, p = 0.014; OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.45, p = 0.009, respectively).

conclusionsIn plaques with similar luminal stenosis, plaque erosion was strongly associated with higher ESS, ESS gradients, and plaque slope as compared with stable plaques. These data support that ESS and slope metrics play a key role in the development of plaque erosion and may help prognosticate individual plaques at risk for future erosion.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePlaque, AtheroscleroticCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsEndothelium, VascularFemaleHeartHumansAcute coronary syndromeEndothelial shear stressPlaque erosion

Identifiers

PMID37257352
PMCPMC10937042
OpenAlexW4376868889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.