Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37257034›Full record

SynthesisEuropean endodontic journal2023

Regenerative Endodontic Procedures in Teeth with Root Resorption: A Systematic Review.

Ashwini Manish Dadpe, Dipali Yogesh Shah, Velmurugan Natanasabapathy, Nivedhitha Malli Sureshbabu, Ajit Narayan Hindlekar, Kajal Modi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European endodontic journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashwini Manish DadpeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.
Dipali Yogesh ShahDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.
Velmurugan NatanasabapathyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Nivedhitha Malli SureshbabuDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Ajit Narayan HindlekarDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.
Kajal ModiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the available clinical literature on the use of regenerative endodontic therapy (RET) for the treatment of root resorption. All case reports, case series and clinical studies documenting the management of root resorption in mature or immature permanent teeth using RET were included. Review articles, animal studies, and RET in teeth showing developmental anomalies were excluded. A literature search was conducted in electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from 2001 to January 2022. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist Quality was used to appraise the included case reports and case series. The Methodological item for non-randomised studies (MINORS) tool was used to appraise the clinical study critically. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the search resulted in 14 studies (12 case reports, 1 case series, and 1 clinical study) accounting for root resorption in 34 teeth from 29 patients treated with RET. Despite the wide variation in RET protocols, the arrest of root resorption and resolution of symptoms was seen in all teeth except one (failure after 27 months). The clinical study's cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging evalu- ation documented a significant volumetric decrease in resorptive and periapical lesions after RET. The clinical study was deemed as good quality using the MINORS scale. The JBI critical appraisal tool showed that the case series was of poor quality; 11 of the case reports were of good quality, while 1 case report was of fair quality. This systematic review revealed a low-to-moderate level of evidence for the use of RET in resorption cases. However, further well-designed, long-term clinical studies are required to recommend it as an alternative treatment option for root resorption management. Funding: None. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021274569). (EEJ-2022-11-136).

Indexed as

Regenerative EndodonticsRoot ResorptionCase Reports as TopicClinical Trials as TopicCone-Beam Computed TomographyDentition, PermanentHumans

Identifiers

PMID37257034
PMCPMC10244915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.