Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37257005›Full record

ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2023

Reappraisal of the Transthoracic Echocardiographic Algorithm in Predicting Pulmonary Hypertension Redefined by Updated Pulmonary Artery Mean Pressure Threshold.

Seda Tanyeri, Hacer Ceren Tokgöz, Ali Karagöz, Özgür Yasar Akbal, Berhan Keskin, Barkın Kültürsay, Aykun Hakgör, Şeyhmus Külahçıoglu, Doğancan Çeneli, Ayhan Tosun and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seda TanyeriDepartment of Cardiology, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Hacer Ceren TokgözDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ali KaragözDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Özgür Yasar AkbalDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Berhan KeskinDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Barkın KültürsayDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Aykun HakgörDepartment of Cardiology, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Şeyhmus KülahçıogluDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Doğancan ÇeneliDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ayhan TosunDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Süleyman EfeDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Zübeyde BayramDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ibrahim Halil TanbogaDepartment of Cardiology, Nişantaşı University, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Nihal ÖzdemirDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Cihangir KaymazDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Medicine, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Kocaeli Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough an adopted echocardiography algorithm based on tricuspid regurgitation jet peak velocity and suggestive findings for pulmonary hypertension has been utilized in the non-invasive prediction of pulmonary hypertension probability, the reliability of this approach for the updated hemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension remains to be determined. In this study, for the first time, we aimed to evaluate the tricuspid regurgitation jet peak velocity and suggestive findings in predicting the probability of pulmonary hypertension as defined by mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 20 mm Hg and > 25 mm Hg, respectively.

methodsOur study group was comprised of the retrospectively evaluated 1300 patients (age 53.1 ± 18.8 years, female 62.1%) who underwent right heart catheterization with different indications between 2006 and 2018. All echocardiographic and right heart catheterization assessments were performed in accordance with the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society 2015 Pulmonary Hypertension Guidelines.

resultsAlthough tricuspid regurgitation jet peak velocity showed a significant relation with mean pulmonary arterial pressure in both definitions, suggestive findings offered a significant contribution only in predicting mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥ 25 mm Hg but not for mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 20 mm Hg. In predicting the mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 20 mm Hg, tricuspid regurgitation jet peak velocity and suggestive findings showed an odds ratio of 2.57 (1.59-4.14, P <.001) and 1.25 (0.86-1.82, P =.16), respectively. In predicting the mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥ 25 mm Hg, tricuspid regurgitation jet peak velocity, and suggestive findings showed an odds ratio of 2.33 (1.80-3.04, P <.001) and 1.54 (1.15-2.08, P <.001), respectively. The tricuspid regurgitation jet peak velocity > 2.8 m/s and tricuspid regurgitation jet peak velocity > 3.4 m/s were associated with 70% and 84% probability of mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 20 mm Hg and 60% and 76% probability of mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥ 25 mm Hg, respectively.

conclusionsIn contrast to those in predicting the mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥ 25 mm Hg, suggestive findings did not provide a significant contribution to the probability of mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 20 mm Hg predicted by tricuspid regurgitation jet peak velocity solely. The impact of the novel mean pulmonary arterial pressure threshold on the echocardiographic prediction of pulmonary hypertension remains to be clarified by future studies.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryTricuspid Valve InsufficiencyAdultAgedCardiac CatheterizationEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPulmonary ArteryReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37257005
PMCPMC10250768
OpenAlexW4378882553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.