Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256961›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

The largest fully protected marine area in North America does not harm industrial fishing.

Fabio Favoretto, Catalina López-Sagástegui, Enric Sala, Octavio Aburto-Oropeza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Global expansion of marine protected areas and the redistribution of fishing effort.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabio FavorettoCentro para la Biodiversidad Marina y la Conservación, A.C., Calle del Pirata 420, Col. El Mezquite, La Paz, BCS, México.ORCID 0000-0002-6493-4254
Catalina López-SagásteguiGulf of California Marine Program, Institute of Americas, UC San Diego Campus, 10111 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-5256
Enric SalaNational Geographic Society, Washington, DC 20036, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4730-3570
Octavio Aburto-OropezaScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8173-1432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) that ban fishing restore marine life within their boundaries and can also replenish nearby fisheries. However, some argue that after large MPAs are established, fishing effort is displaced to unprotected areas and economic loss is incurred by the fishing industry. We tested these assumptions by assessing the behavior and productivity of the Mexican industrial fishing fleet before and after the implementation of the largest fully protected MPA in North America (the 147,000-square kilometer Revillagigedo National Park). We found no decrease in catches and no causal link between the variation of the spatial footprint of the industrial fleet and the implementation of the MPA. Our findings add to growing evidence that well-designed MPAs benefit marine ecosystems and, in the long term, can also benefit the fisheries they support.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAnimalsFisheriesFishesHuntingNorth America

Identifiers

PMID37256961
PMCPMC10231865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.