Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256885›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2023

Pulmonary function following hyperbaric oxygen therapy: A longitudinal observational study.

Connor T A Brenna, Shawn Khan, George Djaiani, Darren Au, Simone Schiavo, Mustafa Wahaj, Ray Janisse, Rita Katznelson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05088772 (Pulmonary Function Following Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05088772 completednot on this map

Pulmonary Function Following Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2016 to 2022Enrolled86ConditionsOxygen ToxicityArmsHyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Connor T A BrennaDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6126-3897
Shawn KhanFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
George DjaianiHyperbaric Medicine Unit, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Darren AuDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Simone SchiavoDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3609-9201
Mustafa WahajHyperbaric Medicine Unit, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ray JanisseHyperbaric Medicine Unit, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rita KatznelsonDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Toronto General Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is known to be associated with pulmonary oxygen toxicity. However, the effect of modern HBOT protocols on pulmonary function is not completely understood. The present study evaluates pulmonary function test changes in patients undergoing serial HBOT. We prospectively collected data on patients undergoing HBOT from 2016-2021 at a tertiary referral center (protocol registration NCT05088772). Patients underwent pulmonary function testing with a bedside spirometer/pneumotachometer prior to HBOT and after every 20 treatments. HBOT was performed using 100% oxygen at a pressure of 2.0-2.4 atmospheres absolute (203-243 kPa) for 90 minutes, five times per week. Patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, medications, HBOT specifications, treatment complications, and spirometry performance. Primary outcomes were defined as change in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75), after 20, 40, and 60 HBOT sessions. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics and mixed-model linear regression. A total of 86 patients were enrolled with baseline testing, and the analysis included data for 81 patients after 20 treatments, 52 after 40 treatments, and 12 after 60 treatments. There were no significant differences in pulmonary function tests after 20, 40, or 60 HBOT sessions. Similarly, a subgroup analysis stratifying the cohort based on pre-existing respiratory disease, smoking history, and the applied treatment pressure did not identify any significant changes in pulmonary function tests during HBOT. There were no significant longitudinal changes in FEV1, FVC, or FEF25-75 after serial HBOT sessions in patients regardless of pre-existing respiratory disease. Our results suggest that the theoretical risk of pulmonary oxygen toxicity following HBOT is unsubstantiated with modern treatment protocols, and that pulmonary function is preserved even in patients with pre-existing asthma, chronic obstructive lung disease, and interstitial lung disease.

Indexed as

Hyperbaric OxygenationLung DiseasesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLungOxygenRetrospective StudiesVital CapacityOxygen

Identifiers

PMID37256885
PMCPMC10231819
OpenAlexW4378904297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.