ArticlePloS one2023
Role of wearable devices in cardiac telerehabilitation: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07322510 (Health Behaviour Change, Education on Risk Factor Reduction, Physical Activity Guidance, and Nutrition Counselling With a Remote Team to Support Patient Progress Using Technology in Synchronization With Medication Management and CardioWatch 287-2.), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Health Behaviour Change, Education on Risk Factor Reduction, Physical Activity Guidance, and Nutrition Counselling With a Remote Team to Support Patient Progress Using Technology in Synchronization With Medication Management and CardioWatch 287-2. (HEARTS in Sync + CardioWatch 287-2)
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy stratification of digital health modalities in home-based cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Heart Rate Monitors for the Estimation of Physical Activity in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Use of commercially available wearable devices for physical rehabilitation in healthcare: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Adherence to Accelerometer Use in Older Adults Undergoing mHealth Cardiac Rehabilitation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Article
- Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation as an Optimal Strategy for Post-MI Recovery: A 14-Week Prospective Study on Clinical and Functional Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Coronary heart disease offspring: identification of short-term cardiovascular risk factors and construction of digital technology-integrated personalized health education pathways.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Digital Health-Optimized Therapeutics for the Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Tracking Cognitive Health With Wearables in Telerehabilitation Female Participants: Could Nighttime Sleep Measures Be Used as Sex-Specific Digital Endpoints?JMIR neurotechnology · 2026Article
- Expert Review of the Strategies to Optimize Long-Term Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Safety and Sufficient Cardiac Rehabilitation With a Wearable Activity Tracker in a Patient With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Residual Stenosis.Cardiology research · 2025Article
- Benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Mechanisms to Restore Function and Clinical Impact.Circulation research · 2025Review
- Wearable Devices for Exercise Prescription and Physical Activity Monitoring in Patients with Various Cardiovascular Conditions.CJC open · 2025Review
- Clinical, Psychological, Physiological, and Technical Parameters and Their Relationship With Digital Tool Use During Cardiac Rehabilitation: Comparison and Correlation Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Article
- Acceptance of Illness and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients After Myocardial Infarction-Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Current State of Connected Sensor Technologies Used During Rehabilitation Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in the Wearable Devices for Monitoring and Management of Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Exploring the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a real-time cardiac telerehabilitation and tele coaching programme using wearable devices in people with a recent myocardial infarction.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Comprehensive and personalized approach is a critical area for developing remote cardiac rehabilitation programs.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Cardio-oncology rehabilitation: are we ready?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based comprehensive program that includes exercise training, health education, physical activity promotion, and extensive counseling for the management of cardiovascular risk factors. Wearable devices monitor certain physiological functions, providing biometric data such as heart rate, movement, sleep, ECG analysis, blood pressure, energy expenditure, and numerous other parameters. Recent evidence supports wearable devices as a likely relevant component in cardiovascular risk assessment and disease prevention. The purpose of this scoping review is to better understand the role of wearable devices in home-based CR (HBCR) and to characterize the evidence regarding the incorporation of wearable devices in HBCR programs and cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS &
findingsWe created a search strategy for multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (Ebsco), Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley), and Scopus (Elsevier). Studies were included if the patients were eligible for CR per Medicare guidelines and >18 years of age and if some type of wearable device was utilized during HBCR. Our search yielded 57 studies meeting all criteria. The studies were classified into 4 groups: patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) without heart failure (HF); patients with HF; patients with heart valve repair or replacement; and patients with exposure to center-based CR. In three groups, there was an upward trend toward improvement in quality of life (QOL) and peak VO2, less sedentary time, and an increase in daily step count in the intervention groups compared to control groups.
conclusionsHBCR using wearable devices can be a comparable alternative or adjunct to center-based CR for patients with CHD and HF. More studies are needed to draw conclusions about the comparability of HBCR to center-based CR in patients with heart valve repair or replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.