Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256653›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2023

Implementation of a Digital Health Tool for Patients Awaiting Input From a Specialist Weight Management Team: Observational Study.

Petra Hanson, Charlotte Summers, Arjun Panesar, Alexandros Leonidas Liarakos, Dominic Oduro-Donkor, Danniella Whyte Oshodi, Luke Hailston, Harpal Randeva, Vinod Menon, Michaela de la Fosse and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of Loneliness and Social Isolation Interventions in Obesity and Obesity-Related Complications.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Petra HansonWarwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6845-1049
Charlotte SummersWarwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0528-698X
Arjun PanesarWarwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7050-9038
Alexandros Leonidas LiarakosWarwickshire Institute for the Study of Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire National Health Services Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1713-3064
Dominic Oduro-DonkorWarwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4223-4983
Danniella Whyte OshodiWarwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1784-9660
Luke HailstonWarwickshire Institute for the Study of Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire National Health Services Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4930-545X
Harpal RandevaWarwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9438-7506
Vinod MenonWarwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9792-9582
Michaela de la FosseDiabetes Digital Media Health, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3387-2003
Amit KauraNational Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare National Health Services Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6962-3199
Emma ShuttlewoodWarwickshire Institute for the Study of Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire National Health Services Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5380-1336
Mark LovederWarwickshire Institute for the Study of Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire National Health Services Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8369-1984
Donna PooleWarwickshire Institute for the Study of Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire National Health Services Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7749-2488
Thomas M BarberWarwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0689-9195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital tools are increasingly used on a population level as a weight loss strategy for people living with overweight and obesity. Evidence supports the feasibility of digital tools for the management of obesity in a community setting, but there is only emerging evidence for the feasibility of such tools in specialist weight management services. No study has assessed the uptake of digital tools among patients awaiting their first appointment with a specialist weight management service.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to understand interest, acceptance, and engagement with a digital behavioral change platform to support specialist weight management.

methodsThis was an observational study registered as a service innovation. All patients on the waiting list for a first appointment in the tier 3 weight management service at University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire National Health Service (NHS) Trust were eligible to access the NHS-approved digital tool. Data on interest and engagement with the digital tool were collected. Routine clinical data were used to describe patient demographics. Focus groups were held to explore patients' views on the use of digital tools as part of a specialist weight management service.

resultsA total of 199 patients on the waiting list were informed about the available digital tool. Just over a half (n=102, 51.3%) of patients were interested in using the app, with over one-third (n=68, 34%) of all patients engaging with the app. Overall, a third of patients on the waiting list (n=63, 32%) did not respond to the invite and 34 (17%) of patients expressed no interest in the app. Emotional eating and higher BMI was associated with interest in the Gro Health app. Male gender was associated with reduced engagement with the app. There were no differences in interest in the Gro Health app according to age, ethnicity, metabolic measures of glycemia, and lipid profile.

conclusionsIt is feasible to offer digital tools such as Gro Health to patients awaiting their first appointment with specialist weight management services. Future research should explore barriers and facilitators of engagement with digital tools. Additionally, there is a need to further evaluate the effectiveness of such tools in specialist weight management services.

Indexed as

attitudebehavior changedigital health, hospitalfocus grouphealth appmHealthmobile healthNational Health Serviceobeseobesityopinionperspectiveprecision healthsecondary caretier 3 weight managementweightweight management

Identifiers

PMID37256653
PMCPMC10267795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.