Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256618›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Association of Preterm Birth and Socioeconomic Status With Neonatal Brain Structure.

Katie Mckinnon, Paola Galdi, Manuel Blesa-Cábez, Gemma Sullivan, Kadi Vaher, Amy Corrigan, Jill Hall, Lorena Jiménez-Sánchez, Michael Thrippleton, Mark E Bastin and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Social Determinants of Health and Early Brain Development.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katie MckinnonMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Paola GaldiMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Manuel Blesa-CábezMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Gemma SullivanMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Kadi VaherMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Amy CorriganMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jill HallMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Lorena Jiménez-SánchezCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Michael ThrippletonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mark E BastinCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alan J QuigleyDepartment of Radiology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Evdoxia ValavaniUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Athanasios TsanasUsher Institute, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Hilary RichardsonSchool of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
James P BoardmanCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBRoyal Hospital for Children · GBThe Alan Turing Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002033Medical Research Council MR/X003434/1The Dunhill Medical Trust R380R/1114Wellcome Trust 108890/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Preterm birth and socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with brain structure in childhood, but the relative contributions of each during the neonatal period are unknown. Objective: To investigate associations of birth gestational age (GA) and SES with neonatal brain morphology by testing 3 hypotheses: GA and SES are associated with brain morphology; associations between SES and brain morphology vary with GA; and associations between SES and brain structure and morphology depend on how SES is operationalized. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study recruited participants from November 2016 to September 2021 at a single center in the United Kingdom. Participants were 170 extremely and very preterm infants and 91 full-term or near-term infants. Exclusion criteria were major congenital malformation, chromosomal abnormality, congenital infection, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, hemorrhagic parenchymal infarction, and posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. Exposures: Birth GA and SES, operationalized at the neighborhood level (using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation), the family level (using parental education and occupation), and subjectively (World Health Organization Quality of Life measure). Main Outcomes and Measures: Brain volume (85 parcels) and 5 whole-brain cortical morphology measures (gyrification index, thickness, sulcal depth, curvature, surface area) at term-equivalent age (median [range] age, 40 weeks, 5 days [36 weeks, 2 days to 45 weeks, 6 days] and 42 weeks [38 weeks, 2 days to 46 weeks, 1 day] for preterm and full-term infants, respectively). Results: Participants were 170 extremely and very preterm infants (95 [55.9%] male; 4 of 166 [2.4%] Asian, 145 of 166 [87.3%] White) and 91 full-term or near-term infants (50 [54.9%] male; 3 of 86 [3.5%] Asian, 78 of 86 [90.7%] White infants) with median (range) birth GAs of 30 weeks, 0 days (22 weeks, 1 day, to 32 weeks, 6 days) and 39 weeks, 4 days (36 weeks, 3 days, to 42 weeks, 1 day), respectively. In fully adjusted models, birth GA was associated with a higher proportion of brain volumes (27 of 85 parcels [31.8%]; β range, -0.20 to 0.24) than neighborhood-level SES (1 of 85 parcels [1.2%]; β = 0.17 [95% CI, -0.16 to 0.50]) or family-level SES (maternal education: 4 of 85 parcels [4.7%]; β range, 0.09 to 0.15; maternal occupation: 1 of 85 parcels [1.2%]; β = 0.06 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.11] respectively). There were interactions between GA and both family-level and subjective SES measures on regional brain volumes. Birth GA was associated with cortical surface area (β = 0.10 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.18]) and gyrification index (β = 0.16 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.25]); no SES measure was associated with cortical measures. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of UK infants, birth GA and SES were associated with neonatal brain morphology, but low GA had more widely distributed associations with neonatal brain structure than SES. Further work is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the association of both GA and SES with early brain development.

Indexed as

Infant, Premature, DiseasesPremature BirthBrainCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleQuality of LifeSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID37256618
PMCPMC10233421
OpenAlexW4378781489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.