Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256578›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2023

Standard Restrictions vs Expedited Activity After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Michele O'Shea, Nazema Y Siddiqui, Tracy Truong, Alaattin Erkanli, Matthew D Barber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04329715 (Expedited Versus Restrictive), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04329715 nacompletednot on this map

Expedited Versus Restrictive: Limitations on Activity Following Surgical Treatment of Prolapse

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled123ConditionsPelvic Organ ProlapseArmsExpedited postoperative activity instructions, Standard postoperative activity restructions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Measuring Pelvic Organ Prolapse: An Evolution.International urogynecology journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michele O'SheaDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Nazema Y SiddiquiDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Tracy TruongDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Alaattin ErkanliDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew D BarberDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University Health System · US

Funding

Resource Core 3 - Metabolomics CoreP30AG028716 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CATHLEEN S COLON-EMERIC, Susan Nicole Hastings · 2006 to 2026
$24.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Restrictions on postoperative activity following pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery are not evidence based. Nonetheless, many pelvic surgeons place lifting and activity restrictions on patients following surgery. Objective: To evaluate whether expedited activity results in noninferior anatomic and symptomatic outcomes compared with standard activity restrictions after POP surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized noninferiority clinical trial included patients undergoing vaginal or laparoscopic apical reconstructive surgery for POP between July 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021, at a single academic tertiary referral center in Durham, North Carolina. Anatomic outcomes were assessed by masked examiners, and subjective outcomes were assessed via validated surveys, both completed at 3 months postoperatively. Patients meeting minimum physical activity criteria with at least stage II bothersome POP were eligible. A total of 218 patients were approached, of whom 123 were randomly assigned and 107 had complete outcome data and were included in the analysis. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard restrictions vs expedited postoperative activity instructions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The anatomic coprimary outcome was maximum anatomic POP support loss (SLmax), which is the most distal point of pelvic organ support loss according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (noninferiority margin, 1.0 cm). The symptomatic coprimary outcome was the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI) symptom score (noninferiority margin, 34.3 points). Differences between outcomes were assessed using linear regression models controlling for baseline SLmax and POPDI, respectively. Results: Of 123 participants randomized, 107 had complete 3-month outcome data and were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) age was 62.8 (10.1) years. At 3 months, mean (SD) SLmax was -1.7 (1.4) cm in the expedited group and -1.5 (1.4) cm in the standard group (P = .44). After adjusting for baseline SLmax, the mean maximum support loss was 0.18 cm higher within the vaginal canal in the expedited group (95% CI, -0.68 to 0.33 cm). The coprimary outcome of POPDI score was a mean (SD) 23.7 (41.8) points in the expedited group vs 25.7 (39.3) points in the standard group (P = .80). After adjusting for baseline scores, mean POPDI scores were 5.79 points lower in the expedited group (95% CI, -20.41 to 8.84). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings demonstrate that expedited activity after prolapse surgery results in noninferior anatomic and symptomatic prolapse outcomes. It is reasonable to instruct patients undergoing minimally invasive prolapse surgery to resume physical activities ad lib postoperatively. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04329715.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapsePlastic Surgery ProceduresExerciseFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvis

Identifiers

PMID37256578
PMCPMC10233453
OpenAlexW4378783571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.