Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256485›Full record

Trial reportProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2024

The Effect of Ophthalmic and Systemic Formulations of Latilactobacillus sakei on Clinical and Immunological Outcomes of Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A Factorial, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, and Triple-masking Clinical Trial.

Mojtaba Heydari, Mehdi Kalani, Younes Ghasemi, Mahmood Nejabat

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04938908 (Efficacy and Safety of Systemic and Ophthalmic Probiotic on Microbiota, Immunological and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04938908 phase2completednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Systemic and Ophthalmic Probiotic on Microbiota, Immunological and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorShiraz University of Medical SciencesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsDry Eye SyndromeArmsOphthalmic Probiotic, Opthalmic Placebo, Oral Probiotic Capsule, Oral Placebo Capsule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Oral Intake ofBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mojtaba HeydariPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand St., Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9612-0936
Mehdi KalaniAlborzi Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4478-5957
Younes GhasemiPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand St., Shiraz, Iran. ghasemiy@sums.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0003-4172-0672
Mahmood NejabatPoostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. nejabatm@sums.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0001-5761-3594
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 97-01-104-18912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is one of the most prevalent eye diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Latilactobacillus sakei (L. sakei) either as an ophthalmic bacterial lysate (drops, no live organism) or as an oral probiotic (capsules) on immunological and clinical outcomes of patients with DED. This study was a randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-masking clinical trial with four parallel arms. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2x2 factorial design combining active vs placebo capsules and active vs placebo eye drops in a 1:1x1:1 ratio. The ophthalmic drops are approved for use in the European Union as a medical device (CE registration code 0425-MED-004235). A total of 40 patients were evaluated. DED signs and symptoms decreased significantly by using active drops compared to placebo, as measured by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Tear Break-up Time (TBUT), and Schirmer I tests (all p<0.0001). Conversely, neither active capsules nor their interaction effect with active drops achieved significance vs placebo. There was also a significant decrease in the tear levels of IL-6 (p=0.0007), TNFα (p<0.0001), and IFNγ (p<0.0001) in patients receiving active drops. Intake of both active products (drops and capsules) was well tolerated. Postbiotic ophthalmic formulation containing L. sakei lysate significantly improved the signs and symptoms of DED and suppressed ocular surface inflammatory response. Conversely, oral intake of L.sakei as a probiotic capsule had no effect in these patients (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04938908).

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesLatilactobacillus sakeiProbioticsAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsOphthalmic SolutionsCytokinesDry eye diseaseInflammationLatilactobacillus sakeiPostbioticProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID37256485
OpenAlexW4378782906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.