Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256442›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2023

Evaluation of presence of clone ST131 and biofilm formation in ESBL producing and non-producing Escherichia coli strains.

Demet Celebi, Elif Aydın, Erva Rakici, Sumeyye Baser, Ozgur Celebi, Ali Taghizadehghalehjoughi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Activity of zinc oxide and zinc borate nanoparticles against resistant bacteria in an experimental lung cancer model.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Demet CelebiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey. dmtdl2006@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-0561
Elif AydınTavsanli Vocational School of Health Services, Kutahya Health Sciences University, 430200, Kutahya, Turkey.
Erva RakiciDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53020, Rize, Turkey.
Sumeyye BaserDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ozgur CelebiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ali TaghizadehghalehjoughiDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Şeyh Edebali University, 11000, Bilecik, Turkey.
Atatürk University · TRBilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi · TRKutahya Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRecep Tayyip Erdoğan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEscherichia coli ST131 is a pandemic clone associated with multidrug resistance, starting with beta-lactamase production and fluoroquinolone resistance in the first place, leading to significant systemic infections. Clones that develop due to the frequency of antimicrobial resistance and the rate of spread in our country are important issues that need to be investigated. This study aims to investigate the incidence of ST131which is a "high-risk pandemic clone E. coli" in ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing strains, as well as their biofilm-forming abilities and antibiotic resistance rates. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 86 E. coli isolates were used in the study. Bacterial identifications were performed by conventional and automated methods. The double disc synergy method was used to demonstrate the presence of ESBL. Molecular studies in all E. coli strains were performed by real-time PCR method.

findings86 strains were studied, of which 83.72% were urine, 6.98% were wound, 4.65% were blood, and 2.33% were tracheal aspirate and sputum. 79.07% of these strains were ESBL-positive. 58.1% of the strains were female, whereas 41.9% were male patients, and the average age was 46.2. Out of 86 strains, 38.72% were ST131 positive, the H30 subclone was detected in 27.27% of them, and the H30-Rx subclone was detected in all of the H30 subclone positive strains. The presence of the ESBL resistance gene was detected at the rate of TEM 41.86%, SHV 37.21%, CTX-M 36.04%, and OXA 4.65%. Most commonly SHV gene (54.54%) was seen in ST131 clone-positive samples. Finally, while it was found that 48.83% of the strains formed biofilm by any method, biofilm formation was detected in 69.7% of the samples that were positive for the ST131 clone.

resultOur study can reveal the dramatic prevalence of the ESBL-producing E. coli strains along with the high-risk ST131 clone, the dominance of the H30Rx subclone of this risky clone, as well as the importance of the influence of resistance mechanisms along with resistance and biofilm.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coliFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular EpidemiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coli ProteinsBiofilmE. coli ST131ESBLHigh-risk cloneMulti-drug resistance

Identifiers

PMID37256442
PMCPMC10229391
OpenAlexW4378781214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.