Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256423›Full record

GuidelineWiener klinische Wochenschrift2023

Screening for colorectal cancer : A recommendation statement of the Austrian National Committee for Cancer Screening.

Gerald Gartlehner, Eva Schernhammer, Sigurd F Lax, Matthias Preusser, Herbert Bachler, Harald Titzer, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Helga Turnher, Uwe Siebert

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Definition of Skills and Roles of the Digestive Endoscopy Nurse: Italian Consensus of ANOTE-ANIGEA.Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerald GartlehnerDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University of Krems, Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Str. 30, 3500, Krems, Austria. gerald.gartlehner@donau-uni.ac.at.
Eva SchernhammerCenter for Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sigurd F LaxPathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria.
Matthias PreusserDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Herbert BachlerTyrolean College of General Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Harald TitzerAustrian Society of Hematology and Oncology Nurses, Vienna, Austria.
Maria Kletecka-PulkerInstitute for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Helga TurnherColorectal Cancer Patient Support Group, Vienna, Austria.
Uwe SiebertUMIT TIROL-University for Health Sciences and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group · ATJohannes Kepler University of Linz · ATMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer in Austria. To date, colorectal cancer screening in Austria remains opportunistic and includes colonoscopy or stool-based blood tests. The Austrian National Committee for Cancer Screening developed evidence-based recommendations for a nationwide organized colorectal cancer screening program.

methodsThe methodological framework followed the approach of the United States Preventive Services Task Force. The evidence base underlying the newly developed recommendations comprised a review of the existing published evidence and a decision analytic model tailored to the Austrian context. Using a structured process, committee members considered 1) the magnitude of the net benefit of each screening strategy, 2) the certainty of evidence, and 3) the level of acceptance of the interventions among the target population. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Austrian National Committee for Cancer Screening recommends the implementation of a nationwide organized colorectal cancer screening program for all adults aged 45-75 years. For persons 65 years or older, screening decisions should occur on an individual basis in accordance with a person's overall health, prior screening history, and preferences. Specifically, the committee recommends either a 10-year screening colonoscopy or biennial fecal immunochemical tests with colonoscopy following a positive result, with both screening strategies considered equivalent. Each citizen should be able to make an informed decision about their preferred screening method. Switching between the two screening strategies should be possible. Following an unremarkable colonoscopy, screening by fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is only required after 10 years. Screening recommendations apply only to asymptomatic persons at average risk for colorectal cancer. The screening program must be pilot tested, and accompanied by a public information campaign, formative evaluation, quality assurance, and data collection.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAgedAustriaColonoscopyHumansMiddle AgedAustriaColonoscopyFecal occult blood testGuidelineNationwidePrevention

Identifiers

PMID37256423
PMCPMC10497440
OpenAlexW4378782386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.