Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256418›Full record

Trial reportUrolithiasis2023

A retrospective study using machine learning to develop predictive model to identify urinary infection stones in vivo.

Yukun Wu, Qishan Mo, Yun Xie, Junlong Zhang, Shuangjian Jiang, Jianfeng Guan, Canhui Qu, Rongpei Wu, Chengqiang Mo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Urolithiasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yukun Wu *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Qishan Mo *Department of Urology, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Yun XieDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Junlong ZhangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Shuangjian JiangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Jianfeng GuanDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Canhui QuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Rongpei WuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Chengqiang MoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China. mochengq@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative diagnosis of urinary infection stones is difficult, and accurate detection of stone composition can only be performed ex vivo. To provide guidance for better perioperative management and postoperative prevention of infection stones, we developed a machine learning model for preoperative identification of infection stones in vivo. The clinical data of patients with urolithiasis who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2015 and January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 2565 patients were included in the study, and 1168 eligible patients with urinary calculi were randomly divided into training set (70%) and test set (30%). Five machine learning algorithms (Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), and Adaptive Boost (AdaBoost)) and 14 preoperative variables were used to construct the prediction model. The performance measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the validation set. The importance of 14 features in each prediction model for predicting infection stones was analyzed. A total of 89 patients (5.34%) with infection stones were included in the validation set. All the five prediction models showed strong discrimination in the validation set (AUC: 0.689-0.772). AdaBoost model was selected as the final model (AUC: 0.772(95% confidence interval, 0.657-0.887); Sensitivity: 0.522; Specificity: 0.902), UC positivity, and urine pH value were two important predictors of infection stones. We developed a predictive model through machine learning that can quickly identify infection stones in vivo with good predictive performance. It can be used for risk assessment and decision support of infection stones, optimize the disease management of urinary calculi and improve the prognosis of patients.

Indexed as

Urinary CalculiAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesInfection stonesMachine learningPrediction modelStruviteUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID37256418
PMCPMC10232574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.