Trial reportUrolithiasis2023
A retrospective study using machine learning to develop predictive model to identify urinary infection stones in vivo.
Trial report in Urolithiasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of a LASSO regression-based predictive model for recurrence of urinary tract stones.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- A study on metabolic differences between infectious and non-infectious stones in patients with urine culture positive for Proteus mirabilis.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a Predictor of Urinary Tract Infection in Patients with Urinary Stone Disease: Development a Novel User-Friendly Tool.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a urinary stone composition prediction model based on machine learning.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- A novel method and classification criteria for analyzing urine turbidity and its relationship with urine dry chemical parameters.PloS one · 2025Observational
- Predictive value of machine learning model based on CT values for urinary tract infection stones.iScience · 2024Article
- Prediction of spontaneous distal ureteral stone passage using artificial intelligence.International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
- Letter to the editor for the article "A nomogram clinical prediction model for predicting urinary infection stones: development and validation in a retrospective study".World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Predicting postoperative pulmonary infection risk in patients with diabetes using machine learning.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preoperative diagnosis of urinary infection stones is difficult, and accurate detection of stone composition can only be performed ex vivo. To provide guidance for better perioperative management and postoperative prevention of infection stones, we developed a machine learning model for preoperative identification of infection stones in vivo. The clinical data of patients with urolithiasis who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2015 and January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 2565 patients were included in the study, and 1168 eligible patients with urinary calculi were randomly divided into training set (70%) and test set (30%). Five machine learning algorithms (Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), and Adaptive Boost (AdaBoost)) and 14 preoperative variables were used to construct the prediction model. The performance measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the validation set. The importance of 14 features in each prediction model for predicting infection stones was analyzed. A total of 89 patients (5.34%) with infection stones were included in the validation set. All the five prediction models showed strong discrimination in the validation set (AUC: 0.689-0.772). AdaBoost model was selected as the final model (AUC: 0.772(95% confidence interval, 0.657-0.887); Sensitivity: 0.522; Specificity: 0.902), UC positivity, and urine pH value were two important predictors of infection stones. We developed a predictive model through machine learning that can quickly identify infection stones in vivo with good predictive performance. It can be used for risk assessment and decision support of infection stones, optimize the disease management of urinary calculi and improve the prognosis of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.