Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256378›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2024

Hostile and threatening interpretation biases in adolescent inpatients are specific to callous-unemotional traits and social anxiety.

Anna L Dapprich, Laura M Derks, Martin Holtmann, Wolf-Gero Lange, Tanja Legenbauer, Eni S Becker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomarkers of Arginine Methylation in Diabetic Nephropathy: Novel Insights from Bioinformatics Analysis.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna L DapprichBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. anna.dapprich@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2208-698X
Laura M DerksBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-0618
Martin HoltmannLWL-University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1845-7688
Wolf-Gero LangeBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4236-0819
Tanja LegenbauerLWL-University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1580-9991
Eni S BeckerBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-426X
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLLWL-Universitätsklinik Hamm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychopathological syndromes, such as disruptive behavior and anxiety disorders in adolescence, are characterized by distorted cognitions and problematic behavior. Biased interpretations of ambiguous social situations can elicit both aggressive and avoidance behavior. Yet, it is not well understood whether different interpretation biases are specific to different syndromes, or whether they can co-occur. We assessed both hostile and threatening interpretation biases in identical social situations, and proposed that they are uniquely related to callous-unemotional (CU) traits and social anxiety, respectively. We also explored the role of gender and age herein. The sample consisted of 390 inpatients between 10 and 18 years of age with a variety of psychiatric disorders. Hostile and threatening interpretations were assessed with the Ambiguous Social Scenario Task (ASST) consisting of 10 written vignettes. Both CU-traits and social anxiety were assessed with self-report questionnaires. Results showed that, overall, CU-traits were related to more hostile interpretations, whereas social anxiety was related to more threatening interpretations. In addition, in boys, hostile and threatening interpretations correlated significantly positive with each other. Age was not related to interpretation biases. Together, these results generally support the content-specificity of interpretation biases in concepts relevant to disruptive behavior disorders and anxiety disorders, and indicate that different interpretation biases can co-occur specifically in boys.

Indexed as

Conduct DisorderAdolescentAggressionAnxietyBiasEmotionsHumansInpatientsMaleAdolescenceCognitive distortionsExternalizing disordersInternalizing disordersSocial information processing

Identifiers

PMID37256378
PMCPMC11032296
OpenAlexW4378781759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.