Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256367›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

Can anterior vertebral body tethering provide superior range of motion outcomes compared to posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review.

Darren Li Liang Wong, Pak Tung Mong, Chun Yin Ng, Chun Kwan Ong, Zhekai Qian, Mang Hong Shao, Ling Kwan Ernest Sin, Bao Yi Wong, Chun Ming Wong, Jason Pui Yin Cheung and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pediatric spinal alignment and spinal development.North American Spine Society journal · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Darren Li Liang WongDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9829-3515
Pak Tung MongDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chun Yin NgDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chun Kwan OngDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zhekai QianDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Mang Hong ShaoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ling Kwan Ernest SinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Bao Yi WongDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chun Ming WongDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jason Pui Yin CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. cheungjp@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-0875
Michael ToDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. mikektto@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6853-0591
University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) was introduced as a fusionless alternative to treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) while preserving range of motion (ROM). This is the first systematic review to compare the ROM outcomes between AVBT and PSF in treating AIS.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were patients with AIS treated with AVBT or PSF or both, and clearly defined ROM outcomes; exclusion criteria were scoliosis other than AIS, biomechanical or cadaveric studies, non-English publications, case reports, conference summaries, unpublished literature, commentaries, and reviews. Primary outcome was ROM. Secondary outcomes included Cobb angle correction, quality of life (QOL), complications, and muscle strength and endurance.

resultsTwelve studies were included in this review. We found moderate evidence to support that AVBT results in superior ROM outcomes than PSF while achieving comparable Cobb angle correction with low evidence. The comparison of QOL outcomes between AVBT and PSF remained inconclusive. In addition to the complications noted conventionally in PSF, AVBT could result in over-correction and distal adding-on. We also found very low evidence to support that AIS patients treated with AVBT have superior muscle strength and endurance when compared to those treated with PSF.

conclusionsAVBT provides better preservation of ROM and muscle strength postoperatively when compared with PSF, while achieving comparable curve correction. Future studies should explore the spinal growth trajectory to determine the window of opportunity for AVBT in AIS.

Indexed as

KyphosisScoliosisSpinal FusionAdolescentHumansQuality of LifeRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeVertebral BodyAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisAnterior vertebral body tetheringMobility outcomePosterior spinal fusionRange of motion

Identifiers

PMID37256367
OpenAlexW4378781164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.