ArticleIntensive care medicine2023
How could ChatGPT impact my practice as an intensivist? An overview of potential applications, risks and limitations.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pragmatic risk-stratified framework for using large language models in intensive care medicine: A narrative review.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Review
- Primer on large language models: an educational overview for intensivists.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- A pilot feasibility study comparing large language models in extracting key information from ICU patient text records from an Irish population.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in acute medicine: a call to action.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Federated data access and federated learning: improved data sharing, AI model development, and learning in intensive care.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Performance of ChatGPT on Chinese national medical licensing examinations: a five-year examination evaluation study for physicians, pharmacists and nurses.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Accuracy and Completeness of ChatGPT-Generated Information on Interceptive Orthodontics: A Multicenter Collaborative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The ESICM's digital revolution: Academy Critical Care Education (ACE) courses.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024Article
- Exploring the Potential of Chatbots in Critical Care Nephrology.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- 2030: will we still need our microbiologist?Intensive care medicine · 2023Article
- Applying ChatGPT in public health: a SWOT and PESTLE analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- The evolution of ChatGPT-generated text in scientific medical publications.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
37256340What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.