ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2023
Assessing the functional diversity of rhizobacteria from cacao by partitioning root and shoot biomasses.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant-microbe interactions are critical for the sustainability of agricultural production. In this study, our aims were to characterize the genetic and functional diversity of the culturable bacterial community associated with the cacao rhizosphere and access their potential for growth promotion of cacao seedling. Culture-dependent and molecular methods were used to characterize the population densities and diversity of bacterial communities from soil and cacao plants at two locations and two plant ages. A total of 63 strains were identified through hsp60 sequencing. Pseudomonas and Enterobacter were the most abundant genera in association with the cacao rhizosphere, whereas Bacillus was more numerous in soil. Parameters of seedling growth promotion were evaluated 60 days after inoculation of seeds, with partition of the assessments into root and shoot weight. Each isolate showed beneficial, neutral or deleterious effects on plant growth, depending on the isolate and on the parts of plant assessed. Interestingly, although an apparent overall decrease in total biomass of seedlings (roots + shoots dry matters) was observed for the majority of isolates (89%), 94% of all isolates, in fact, revealed an increase in plant roots/shoots dry biomass ratio. Despite that part of the isolates (35%) appeared to significantly decrease plant height, and that 65% did not influence plant height (neutral effect), 18 had significantly increased root dry biomass; nevertheless, seven of these root growth-increasing isolates simultaneously decreased shoots-related growth parameters. The results of this study evidentiated the functional diversity of culturable cacao rhizobacteria and how the partitioning of roots and shoots in the assessment of plant growth parameters could reveal the biotechnological potential of these isolates for promoting growth of clones for rehabilitation of commercial cacao plantations. KEY POINTS: • The most common culturable bacteria in cacao roots were Pseudomonas and Enterobacter • Most culturable bacteria from cacao roots increased the root/shoot ratio • Roots and shoots should be examined separately to detect cacao beneficial bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37256326What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.