Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256319›Full record

SynthesisClinical neuroradiology2023

Endovascular Treatment and Peri-interventional Management of Ruptured Cerebrovascular Lesions During Pregnancy : Case Series and Case-based Systematic Review.

Manina M Etter, Anh Nguyen, Alex Brehm, Christoph Aberle, Ioannis Tsogkas, Raphael Guzman, Adam A Dmytriw, Carmen Parra-Farinas, Justin R Mascitelli, Vitor Mendes Pereira and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Manina M EtterDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2889-8305
Anh NguyenDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9343-8276
Alex BrehmDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1630-6210
Christoph AberleDepartment of Radiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8763-4801
Ioannis TsogkasDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2561-9603
Raphael GuzmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-0581
Adam A DmytriwNeurointerventional Program, Departments of Medical Imaging & Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, UK.
Carmen Parra-FarinasNeurointerventional Program, Departments of Medical Imaging & Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, UK.
Justin R MascitelliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9409-5810
Vitor Mendes PereiraDivision of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Robert M StarkeJackson Health System, Lois Pope Life Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Isabel FragataDepartment of Neuroradiology, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
João ReisDepartment of Neuroradiology, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Stacey Quintero WolfeDepartments of Neurological Surgery and Radiology, Wake Forest, School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7603-2728
Guilherme B PortoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-0782
Alejandro M SpiottaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7142-5538
Marios-Nikos PsychogiosDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. marios.psychogios@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-414X
University Hospital of Basel · CHMedical University of South Carolina · USUnidade Local de Saúde de São José · PTWestern University · CAJackson Health System · USNeurological Surgery · USSt. Michael's Hospital · CAThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHemorrhagic stroke, particularly occurring from ruptured cerebrovascular malformations, is responsible for 5-12% of all maternal deaths during pregnancy and the puerperium. Whether endovascular treatment is feasible and safe for both the mother and the fetus, is still a matter of debate. The main objective of this case series and systematic review was to share our multi-institutional experience and to assess the feasibility and safety of endovascular treatment during pregnancy, as well as the corresponding maternal and fetal outcomes based on currently available evidence.

methodsWe report a case series of 12 pregnant women presenting with hemorrhagic stroke from ruptured cerebrovascular arteriovenous malformations or aneurysms who underwent endovascular treatment prior to delivery. A systematic literature review of pregnant patients with endovascular treated cerebrovascular malformations, published between 1995 and 2022, was performed. Clinical patient information, detailed treatment strategies, maternal and fetal outcomes as well as information on the delivery were collected and assessed.

resultsIn most patients the course was uneventful and an excellent outcome without significant neurological deficits (mRS ≤ 1) was achieved. Furthermore, the maternal outcome was not worse compared to the general population who underwent endovascular treatment of ruptured vascular brain lesions. Also, in most cases a healthy fetus was born.

conclusionEndovascular treatment of ruptured cerebrovascular malformations during pregnancy is safe and feasible regarding both aspects, the maternal and fetal outcomes. Still, a stronger knowledge base is needed to correctly approach future cases of intracranial hemorrhage in the pregnant population.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedCerebrovascular DisordersEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresHemorrhagic StrokeIntracranial AneurysmIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsFemaleHemorrhageHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesPregnancyTreatment OutcomeCerebral aneurysmCerebrovascular arteriovenous malformationCerebrovascular malformationEndovascular treatmentPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37256319
PMCPMC10449989
OpenAlexW4378783259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.