Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256297›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2023

The Artificial Intelligence application in Aesthetic Medicine: How ChatGPT can Revolutionize the Aesthetic World.

Giovanni Buzzaccarini, Rebecca Susanna Degliuomini, Marco Borin

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni BuzzaccariniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132, Milan, Italy. giovanni.buzzaccarini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9466-0178
Rebecca Susanna DegliuominiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Marco BorinU.O.C. Otorhinolaryngology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITOspedale Maggiore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aesthetic medicine is witnessing a growing importance of ChatGPT and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, as highlighted by the pioneering work of Xie et al. in their article, "Aesthetic Surgery Advice and Counseling from Artificial Intelligence: A Rhinoplasty Consultation with ChatGPT." These advancements promise to revolutionize patient consultations, treatment planning, and follow-up care. AI-driven chatbots, such as ChatGPT, can enhance patient consultations by providing accurate and reliable information on aesthetic procedures, their risks, benefits, and potential outcomes, enabling well-informed decisions and improved treatment outcomes. Furthermore, AI can personalize treatment plans by analyzing patient data, leading to increased precision and satisfaction. AI-powered platforms can also streamline patient follow-up and monitoring, improving patient outcomes and resource utilization, while serving as a valuable educational tool for clinicians. Despite these benefits, AI integration in aesthetic medicine raises concerns about data privacy, security, and potential biases in AI algorithms. To address these challenges, the aesthetic medicine community must establish ethical guidelines, adopt stringent security protocols, and ensure diverse and representative datasets for AI training. Additionally, maintaining the personal connection between patients and providers is crucial for preserving the human touch in patient care.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

RhinoplastySurgery, PlasticArtificial IntelligenceEstheticsHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37256297
OpenAlexW4378782373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.