Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256216›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2023

Comparison of male and female perspective in couples involved in sexual relationships and facing endometriosis.

Fabienne Helfenstein, Alexandra S Kohl Schwartz, Patrick Imesch, Martina Rauchfuss, Monika M Wölfler, Felix Haeberlin, Stefanie von Orelli, Brigitte Leeners

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fabienne HelfensteinDepartment of Reproductive Endocrinology, University Hospital Zurich, 8910 Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexandra S Kohl SchwartzDepartment of Reproductive Endocrinology, University Hospital Zurich, 8910 Zurich, Switzerland.
Patrick ImeschDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, 8910 Zurich, Switzerland.
Martina RauchfussDepartment of Psychosomatics, Charité Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Monika M WölflerDivision of Gynecology, Endocrinology, and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Felix HaeberlinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Canton Hospital St Gallen, 9000 St Gallen, Switzerland.
Stefanie von OrelliDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Triemli Hospital Zurich, 8063 Zurich, Switzerland.
Brigitte LeenersDepartment of Reproductive Endocrinology, University Hospital Zurich, 8910 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While the sexuality of patients with endometriosis is an established topic in research, the possible effect of endometriosis on partnership sexuality has come to the fore only recently. To improve counseling, more information is needed on how both partners experience sexuality in the context of endometriosis. Aim: Previous research regarding endometriosis and sexuality normally focused on one partner to explore couples' intimate relations, whereas this study provides a comparison on both partners' perspectives on their common sexuality. Methods: An overall 302 couples received a questionnaire based on the Brief Index of Sexual Functioning and Sexual History Form, which was modified by endometriosis specialists to better focus on endometriosis-specific aspects. To detect different perspectives on common sexuality within the couple, the Wilcoxon test and the Pearson chi-square test were performed. Outcomes: Various aspects of couple sexuality were assessed by both partners to investigate divergent perspectives between the man and the woman within a couple. Results: On one hand, male and female partners seem to have divergent perspectives on sexual satisfaction in general, desired frequency of sexual contacts, and the question of the female partner engaging in sexual activity despite discomfort. On the other, they have similar perspectives on who takes initiative in sexual contacts, satisfaction with variety in the sexual relationship, and the impact of sexual limitations on their satisfaction within the partnership. Clinical implications: Endometriosis research addressing issues related to sexuality should include male partners; the same applies to consulting women with endometriosis in the context of their relationships rather than as individuals. Strengths and Limitations: This is the first analysis conducted on a larger scale of data from both partners in couples dealing with endometriosis. As it provides quantitative information only, some qualitative information remains unexplored. Conclusion: As both partners showed tendencies to overestimate their partners' sexual satisfaction and had different perspectives on sensitive topics in sexuality, such as the female partner engaging in sexual activity despite discomfort, addressing sexual communication could be a starting point in counseling couples dealing with endometriosis.

Indexed as

endometriosisintimate relationshipsexual behaviorsexual partnerssexual satisfactionspouses

Identifiers

PMID37256216
PMCPMC10226817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.