ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023
Expression and Prognostic Value of Lgr5 in Patients with Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Nanotherapeutic strategies exploiting biological traits of cancer stem cells.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As a cancer stem cells (CSCs) surface marker, Lgr5 plays an important role in the signal transduction of cancer cells and is a potential biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. However, the expression and prognostic value of Lgr5 in recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) remains ambiguous. Materials: We used RNA sequencing to screen differentially expressed mRNAs in eleven specimens of rNPC tissues and five fresh adjacent normal tissue samples and the CSC marker, Lgr5, was identified. The expression level of Lgr5 in rNPC samples was also detected by immunohistochemistry and Western blot assay. The chi-square test was used to analyze the relationship between the clinicopathological variables and the immunostaining of Lgr5. The Log-rank method was used for prognosis analysis. The Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Significantly elevated expression of Lgr5 in the rNPC tissues was observed compared to the normal tissues using RNA sequencing, Western blot and immunohistochemistry. The expression of Lgr5 was significantly correlated with the T stage (P=0.014). High Lgr5 expression (P=0.007), tumor necrosis (P=0.013) and WHO type II (P=0.043) in rNPC patients exhibited worse overall survival (OS). Lgr5 expression was proved to be an independent risk factor for OS (P=0.035) in multivariate analyses, and had promising predictive value for survival and recurrence in rNPC patients (area under the ROC curve: 0.711 and 0.665, P=0.017 and 0.028, respectively). Conclusion: Lgr5 as a CSC marker is a promising therapeutic target and could be employed to predict the survival prognosis of rNPC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.