ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023
An Empirical Study of Feedforward Control in Unplanned Extubation of Nasogastric Tube.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The preventive effect of feedforward control nursing on complications and adverse events during the recovery period of gynecological general anesthesia patients.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Application of the "oral simulated tube feeding method" in enteral nutrition for patients with moderately severe acute pancreatitis: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing the nasogastric feeding route.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Multi-dimensional factors and intervention strategies for nasoenteric tube dysfunction: research progress and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of feedforward control on reducing the incidence of unplanned extubation and improving the quality of catheter nursing. Methods: A total of 186 patients with nasogastric tube after gastrointestinal surgery in the eastern region of our hospital from September 2020 to September 2021 were selected as the control group; 186 patients with nasogastric tube after gastrointestinal surgery in the western region of our hospital at the same period were selected as the experimental group. The influencing factors of unplanned extubation in patients with long-term postoperative nasogastric tube were analyzed, and effective preoperative and postoperative health education was conducted. The ratio of unplanned extubation of nasogastric tube and nursing satisfaction of patients in the two groups were compared. Results: Patient constraint, perceived pressure score, anxiety score, nasal gastrointestinal canal health education feedback score and indwell tube comfort score were independent risk factors for unplanned extubation. The restraint rate and the incidence of unplanned extubation in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group after intervention, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group after feedforward cognitive intervention. After intervention, serum albumin and gastric PH in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The safe nursing management method of feed forward control can effectively reduce the incidence of unplanned extubation in inpatients, which is worth further promoting in nursing work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.