Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37255895›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Oral and Intramuscular Administration of Dexamethasone on Postoperative Pain, Swelling, and Trismus After Surgical Removal of Impacted Third Molar: A Comparative Split-Mouth Study.

Kinjal S Lakhani, Samir Joshi, Sudhir Pawar, Vivek S Nair, Vaishali Korrane, Hamza Salema, Nayla Khan, Jay Patel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kinjal S LakhaniOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Samir JoshiOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Sudhir PawarOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Vivek S NairOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Vaishali KorraneOral Medicine and Radiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Hamza SalemaOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Nayla KhanOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Jay PatelOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context Over the past 60 years, several researchers have conducted extensive studies on the use of dexamethasone to reduce the postoperative complications of lower third molar surgery, namely, pain, edema, and trismus. In this study, we compared the oral and intramuscular methods of dexamethasone administration. Purpose The aim of this research was to assess pain, edema, and trismus in the postoperative period following the surgical removal of the lower third molar using 8 mg of dexamethasone given orally or by intramuscular injection. Method A split-mouth technique was employed for the study, in which each of the two bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars was removed one at a time, separated by at least two weeks. There were 26 participants in this experiment. Two groups were created from the research sample: group A (injection dexamethasone) and group B (tablet dexamethasone). The pain was assessed on the first, second, and third postoperative days. On the first, third, and seventh postoperative days, the parameters, such as edema and trismus, were evaluated. Results As per our study, in terms of edema and trismus, there was less of a statistically significant difference between the two interventions at all time points. While the pain score had a significant difference between both interventions. Conclusion Hence, we conclude that oral dexamethasone is an effective alternative to intramuscular dexamethasone. Oral dexamethasone is comparatively simple, less invasive, painless, and easy for the surgeon and for apprehensive patients, and it offers a cost-effective solution for the suffering often associated with the extraction of impacted lower third molars.

Indexed as

dexamethasoneimpacted mandibular third molarsminor surgical procedureoral corticosteroidspain controlquality of life

Identifiers

PMID37255895
PMCPMC10226760
OpenAlexW4367395391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.