ArticleiScience2023
Unveiling the time course of visual stabilization through human electrophysiology.
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frame effects across space and time.Journal of vision · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Object positions are coded relative to their surroundings, presumably providing visual stability during eye movements. But when does this perceived stability arise? Here we used a visual illusion, the frame-induced position shift, and measured electrophysiological activity elicited by an object whose perceived position was either shifted because of a surrounding frame or not, thus dissociating perceived and physical locations. We found that visually evoked responses were sensitive to only physical location earlier in time (∼70 ms), but both physical and illusory location information was present at a later time point (∼140 ms). Furthermore, location information could be reliably decoded across physical and illusory locations during the later time interval but not during the earlier time interval, demonstrating that neural activity patterns are shared between the two processes at a later stage. These results suggest that visual stability of objects emerges relatively late and is thus dependent on recurrent feedback from higher processing stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.