ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology
YouTube as a source of patient information for pterygium surgery.
Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tools/instruments for assessing YouTube videos on surgical procedures for patient/consumer health education: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Patient vs. physician narratives on refractive surgery in Turkish YouTube videos: a comparative reflexive thematic analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analyzing Turkish-Language HPV Vaccination Videos on YouTube: Assessing Content Quality and Educational Value.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on myopia: a video content analysis.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients use the YouTube platform to get information about pterygium surgery, and this affects the treatment decisions of the patients. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as educational resources about pterygium surgery. Design: This is a register-based retrospective study. Methods: This was a retrospective, record-based study. A YouTube search was performed using the terms 'pterygium surgery' and 'pterygium eye surgery', resulting in the evaluation of a total of 200 videos. In the end, 122 English-language videos about pterygium surgery were recruited to study. All videos were rated with the DISCERN, the Results: The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS values were 38.9 ± 10.9, 1.8 ± 0.8, and 2.2 ± 1, respectively. The YouTube videos about pterygium surgery had been uploaded by a physician in 63 (51.6%) and non-physicians in 59 (48.4%) cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of general characteristics and scores. Conclusions: Our results show that YouTube videos about pterygium surgery have low quality and credibility and are not sufficient in terms of providing patient information. Registration: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.