ArticleMethodsX2023
Optimization technique for increasing resolution in computed tomography imaging.
Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Starting from the importance of conforming to biological reality in medicine, in this paper we propose an optimization technique for increasing resolution of computed tomography (CT) images acquired using various existing scanners. Considering a three-dimensional Hounsfield Units (HU) array, together with the corresponding spatial metadata of interest (pixel sizes and slice thickness), the procedure is based on halving each voxel along the directions of the device's Cartesian frame of reference and find those values which are both satisfying the X-Rays attenuation coefficient average requirement and minimizing the HU distance to classical interpolation points. The discussed method was tested by implementing a C# .Net 6, cross-platform library containing two algorithm flavors that could be independently applied: "Z" for doubling the number of slices, and "XY" for doubling the resolution of individual slices. This design allows also chaining (e.g. one could apply the "Z,XY,Z" sequence in order to reduce four times slice thickness). In the context of existing unavoidable limitations, the first results are suggesting the "CT compatible" interpolation technique could provide a reasonable approximation of reality. However, the main advantage comes from satisfying mass conservation, which is of high importance in medical diagnosis and treatment.•The Hounsfield Units scale is defined as a linear transformation of the X-Rays attenuation coefficients. Thus, splitting a computed tomography voxel into two congruent volumes must satisfy the HU average requirement (the initial value must equal the average of the two output HU values).•Existing interpolation methods (linear, spline, etc.) are not compatible with the computed tomography HU average requirement. This could also result in mass estimate anomalies with significant impact in medical diagnosis.•The proposed "CT compatible" interpolation method is based on finding those values which are both satisfying the X-Rays attenuation coefficient average requirement and minimizing the Hounsfield Units distance to classical interpolation points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.