ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
A major QTL identification and candidate gene analysis of watermelon fruit cracking using QTL-seq and RNA-seq.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knockout of LbSP1 and LbSP5G1 Reveals Efficient Customization of Shoot Architecture in Black Goji Berry.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Genome-wide identification of eQTL-associated lncRNAs in melon and their role in fruit cracking.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reverse BSA-QTLseq: A new genotype-driven bioinformatics approach for simultaneous trait mapping.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Genomic resources and genetic improvement of vital tropical and subtropical fruit crops: current status and prospects.AoB PLANTS · 2025Review
- Watermelon fruit metabolome gene discovery and its application in breeding: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Fine genetic mapping and transcriptomic analysis revealed major gene modulating the clear stripe margin pattern of watermelon peel.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fruit cracking decreases the total production and the commercial value of watermelon. The molecular mechanisms of fruit cracking are unknown. In this study, 164 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of watermelon, derived from the crossing of the WQ1 (cracking-sensitive) and WQ2 (cracking-tolerant) lines, were sequenced using specific length amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq). A high-density genetic linkage map was constructed with 3,335 markers spanning 1,322.74 cM, at an average 0.40 cM across whole-genome flanking markers. The cracking tolerance capacity (CTC), depth of fruit cracking (DFC), rind thickness (RT), and rind hardness (RH) were measured for quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis. Of the four traits analyzed, one major QTL with high phenotypic variation (41.04%-61.37%) was detected at 76.613-76.919 cM on chromosome 2, which contained 104 annotated genes. Differential gene expression analysis with RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data between the two parents identified 4,508 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Comparison of the genes between the QTL region and the DEGs obtained eight coexisting genes. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis revealed that these genes were significant differentially expressed between the two parents. These results provide new insights into the identification of QTLs or genes and marker-assisted breeding in watermelon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.