Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37255121›Full record

ReviewRevista de saude publica2023

Overview of SARS-COV-2 infection at the Butantan Penitentiary Progression Center.

Soraya Gomes de Amorim Andrade, Fernando Moreira Andrade, Anderson da Silva, Maria Regina Alves Cardoso, Guilherme Rodrigues Ferraz, Eliana Nogueira Castro de Barros, Patrícia Emilia Braga, Milena Martello Cristófalo, Júlia Rabello Guerra Vieira, Carolina de Souza Lopes and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista de saude publica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Soraya Gomes de Amorim AndradeUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Saúde, Ciclos de Vida e Sociedade. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5205-0745
Fernando Moreira AndradeUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Saúde, Ciclos de Vida e Sociedade. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-758X
Anderson da SilvaInstituto Butantan. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-7193
Maria Regina Alves CardosoUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Epidemiologia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6092-9215
Guilherme Rodrigues FerrazInstituto Butantan. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-4997
Eliana Nogueira Castro de BarrosInstituto Butantan. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1476-4337
Patrícia Emilia BragaInstituto Butantan. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3442-2343
Milena Martello CristófaloUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Saúde, Ciclos de Vida e Sociedade. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-1873
Júlia Rabello Guerra VieiraSanta Casa de São Paulo. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2360-1186
Carolina de Souza LopesCentro Universitário São Camilo. Faculdade de Medicina. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-285X
Alyne NiyamaSanta Casa de São Paulo. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-8893
Juliana Lima de CarvalhoSanta Casa de São Paulo. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4288-3158
José Mendes AldrighiUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Saúde, Ciclos de Vida e Sociedade. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-7876
Universidade de São Paulo · BRInstituto Butantan · BRFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BRCentro Universitário São Camilo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus among individuals living in restricted freedom.

methodsA seroprevalence survey was carried out with the population of the female penitentiary of the Centro de Progressão Penitenciária (CPP) in Butantan (municipality of São Paulo), between June 24 and August 20, 2020. During this period, according to the Secretariat of Penitentiary Administration (SAP), the positivity of rapid tests among inmates ranged from 65% to 78%. The evaluation method used in the study was the "One Step COVID-19" rapid test (chromatography), from the company Wondfo, also using the RT-PCR method in symptomatic participants to confirm the viral condition. The study population consisted of 879 female inmates and 170 employees of the institution.

resultsThe prevalence of total antibodies (IgG/IgM) against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the total population of 1049 study participants was 6.1%; among the population of 879 inmates,a prevalence of 5.8% was observed, and among the institution's employees, 7.5%.

conclusionsThe prevalence of covid-19 at the Butantan CPP was low, which is due to the implementation of simple prevention measures at the institution, such as the use of masks (with appropriate changes), emphasis on hygiene, hand washing and social distancing, in addition to other strategies, such as suspending inmates' visits from relatives and friends and cutting back on elective medical appointments and outside work.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, ViralBrazilFemaleHumansPrisonsSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID37255121
PMCPMC10185309
OpenAlexW4378717042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.