Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37254938›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2023

Expert Algorithm for Substance Identification Using Mass Spectrometry: Application to the Identification of Cocaine on Different Instruments Using Binary Classification Models.

Samantha A Mehnert, J Tyler Davidson, Alexandra Adeoye, Brandon D Lowe, Emily A Ruiz, Jacob R King, Glen P Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samantha A MehnertDepartment of Forensic and Investigative Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.
J Tyler DavidsonDepartment of Forensic and Investigative Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9932-8273
Alexandra AdeoyeDepartment of Forensic and Investigative Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-0321-0233
Brandon D LoweC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.
Emily A RuizC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.
Jacob R KingC. Eugene Bennett Department of Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.
Glen P JacksonDepartment of Forensic and Investigative Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0803-6254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the second of two manuscripts describing how general linear modeling (GLM) of a selection of the most abundant normalized fragment ion abundances of replicate mass spectra from one laboratory can be used in conjunction with binary classifiers to enable specific and selective identifications with reportable error rates of spectra from other laboratories. Here, the proof-of-concept uses a training set of 128 replicate cocaine spectra from one crime laboratory as the basis of GLM modeling. GLM models for the 20 most abundant fragments of cocaine were then applied to 175 additional test/validation cocaine spectra collected in more than a dozen crime laboratories and 716 known negative spectra, which included 10 spectra of three diastereomers of cocaine. Spectral similarity and dissimilarity between the measured and predicted abundances were assessed using a variety of conventional measures, including the mean absolute residual and NIST's spectral similarity score. For each spectral measure, GLM predictions were compared to the traditional exemplar approach, which used the average of the cocaine training set as the consensus spectrum for comparisons. In unsupervised models, EASI provided better than a 95% true positive rate for cocaine with a 0% false positive rate. A supervised binary logistic regression model provided 100% accuracy and no errors using EASI-predicted abundances of only four peaks at

Indexed as

binary classificationdrug identificationforensic sciencesearch algorithmspectral algorithmspectral comparisons

Identifiers

PMID37254938
PMCPMC10326919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.