ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2023
Expert Algorithm for Substance Identification Using Mass Spectrometry: Application to the Identification of Cocaine on Different Instruments Using Binary Classification Models.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is the second of two manuscripts describing how general linear modeling (GLM) of a selection of the most abundant normalized fragment ion abundances of replicate mass spectra from one laboratory can be used in conjunction with binary classifiers to enable specific and selective identifications with reportable error rates of spectra from other laboratories. Here, the proof-of-concept uses a training set of 128 replicate cocaine spectra from one crime laboratory as the basis of GLM modeling. GLM models for the 20 most abundant fragments of cocaine were then applied to 175 additional test/validation cocaine spectra collected in more than a dozen crime laboratories and 716 known negative spectra, which included 10 spectra of three diastereomers of cocaine. Spectral similarity and dissimilarity between the measured and predicted abundances were assessed using a variety of conventional measures, including the mean absolute residual and NIST's spectral similarity score. For each spectral measure, GLM predictions were compared to the traditional exemplar approach, which used the average of the cocaine training set as the consensus spectrum for comparisons. In unsupervised models, EASI provided better than a 95% true positive rate for cocaine with a 0% false positive rate. A supervised binary logistic regression model provided 100% accuracy and no errors using EASI-predicted abundances of only four peaks at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.