ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023
Co-ideation and co-design in co-creation research: Reflections from the 'Co-Creating Safe Spaces' project.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Alert System to Facilitate Universal Suicide Risk Screening in Emergency Care: Protocol for a Prediction Model and Software Development Study Using a Co-Design Approach.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- The Cycle of Equitable Codesign' Using Restorative Practice Principles to Address Epistemic Injustice and Advance Codesign in Mental Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Co-Creation of Interventions to Promote Critical Health Literacy in the Community: Study Protocol.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Scoping Review of Co-Design in Mental Health Research: Essential Elements and Recommendations.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2026Article
- Distress, Discomfort and Moral Injury: Emergency Department Clinicians Experiences Caring for People With a Psychosocial Disability and a National Disability Insurance Scheme Plan.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Co-designing suicide prevention research with mothers of suicidal adolescents - applying McKercher's Model of Care.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- "I finally found a place where I could have some safety": A mixed-methods evaluation of non-clinical safe spaces for emotional distress and/or suicidal crisis.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Imagining a Safe Space: Australian Community Views About What Makes Crisis Mental Health Services 'Safe' and 'Unsafe'.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Mind over waves: uncovering mental health toolkit gaps for young Australian surf lifesavers through an environmental scan and expert survey.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Lived Experience Participation in Suicide Prevention Activities in Australia, a Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Using experience-based co-design approach to address mental health issues among healthcare workers and leaders in long-term care.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Co-Creation in Research: Further Reflections From the 'Co-Creating Safe Spaces' Project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Partnership between a consumer-led mental health research network and a large mental health research organisation: an Australian mixed methods case study.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- 'Keeping it real': A qualitative exploration of preferences of people with lived experience for participation and active involvement in mental health research in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Culturally contextualized suicide prevention for international students: new opportunities for research and practice.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Harmonising outcome measurement for child focused domestic abuse interventions. Reflections on the development and implementation of a core outcome set.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Co-ideation and co-design in co-creation research: Reflections from the 'Co-Creating Safe Spaces' project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNumerous frameworks for defining and supporting co-created research exist. The practicalities of designing and conducting co-created research are clearly important, yet the utility of these frameworks and their operationalisation within local contexts and involving a diversity of stakeholders and interests are currently not well-researched.
methodsUsing an instrumental case study approach, we examined the utility of a published systematic framework designed to improve clarity about co-creation as a concept and approach. The framework is explored based on the first two processes that correspond to our own work to date: co-ideation and co-design.
resultsOur study showed that diverse stakeholders bring challenges regarding research priorities, methods, language and the distribution of power within co-creation processes. Co-creation activities were incremental, adaptable, responsive and made best use of established relationships, structures and collective leadership to meet the competing demands of funders and human research ethics committees, while ensuring the meaningful participation of multiple stakeholders.
conclusionThe findings highlight the iterative, fluid and deeply relational nature of co-created research. Rather than seeking to categorise these processes, we argue that the social relations of research production that provide the structures within which all co-created knowledge is generated are more important drivers of effective knowledge mobilisation and implementation. Thus, close attention to these social relations is needed in co-created research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People with lived experience of emotional distress and/or suicidal crisis, including academic researchers, service and peer workers, carers and advocates were involved in the co-ideation and co-design of this research. All authors identify as people with lived experience, from both academic and nonresearch backgrounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.