Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37254158›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2023

Identification of an optimal threshold to define oliguria in critically ill patients: an observational study.

Nathan Axel Bianchi, Marco Altarelli, Céline Monard, Tatiana Kelevina, Aziz Chaouch, Antoine Guillaume Schneider

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan Axel BianchiAdult Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 46, Avenue du Bugnon, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marco AltarelliAdult Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 46, Avenue du Bugnon, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Céline MonardAdult Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 46, Avenue du Bugnon, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tatiana KelevinaAdult Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 46, Avenue du Bugnon, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aziz ChaouchDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Antoine Guillaume SchneiderAdult Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 46, Avenue du Bugnon, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. antoine.schneider@chuv.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relevance of current consensus threshold to define oliguria has been challenged by small observational studies. We aimed to determine the optimal threshold to define oliguria in critically-ill patients.

methodsCohort study including adult patients admitted within a multi-disciplinary intensive care unit between January 1st 2010 and June 15th 2020. Patients on chronic dialysis or who declined consent were excluded. We extracted hourly urinary output (UO) measurements along with patient's characteristics from electronic medical records and 90-day mortality from the Swiss national death registry. We randomly split our data into a training (80%) and a validation (20%) set. In the training set, we developed multivariable models to assess the relationship between 90-day mortality and the minimum average UO calculated over time windows of 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. Optimal thresholds were determined by visually identifying cut-off values for the minimum average UO below which predicted mortality increased substantially. We tested models' discrimination and calibration on the entire validation set as well as on a subset of patients with oliguria according to proposed thresholds.

resultsAmong the 15,500 patients included in this analysis (training set: 12,440, validation set: 3110), 73.0% (95% CI [72.3-73.8]) presented an episode of oliguria as defined by consensus criteria (UO < 0.5 ml/kg/h for 6 h). Our models had excellent (AUC > 85% for all time windows) discrimination and calibration. The relationship between minimum average UO and predicted 90-day mortality was nonlinear with an inflexion point at 0.2 ml/kg/h for 3 and 6 h windows and 0.3 ml/kg/h for 12 and 24 h windows. Considering a threshold of < 0.2 ml/kg/h over 6 h, the proportion of patients with an episode of oliguria decreased substantially to 24.7% (95% CI [24.0-25.4]). Contrary to consensus definition, this threshold identified a population with a higher predicted 90-day mortality.

conclusionsThe widely used cut-off for oliguria of 0.5 ml/kg/h over 6 h may be too conservative. A cut-off of 0.2 ml/kg/h over 3 or 6 h is supported by the data and should be considered in further definitions of oliguria.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCritical IllnessAdultCohort StudiesHumansIntensive Care UnitsOliguriaRetrospective StudiesAcute kidney injuryCritical illnessICU mortalityOliguriaThresholdsUrinary output

Identifiers

PMID37254158
PMCPMC10228087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.