Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37254157›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2023

Evaluating a multimodal, clinical and work-directed intervention (RTW-PIA) to support sustainable return to work among employees with mental disorders: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Fiona Starke, Alexandra Sikora, Ralf Stegmann, Leonie Knebel, Claudia Buntrock, Angelique de Rijk, Inge Houkes, Gregor R Szycik, Hans-Peter Unger, Jan Ole Schumacher and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Fiona StarkeDivision 3 Work and Health, Unit 3.5 Evidence-based Occupational Health, Workplace Health Management, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, Berlin, 10317, Germany. Starke.Fiona@baua.bund.de.
Alexandra SikoraDivision 3 Work and Health, Unit 3.5 Evidence-based Occupational Health, Workplace Health Management, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, Berlin, 10317, Germany.
Ralf StegmannDivision 3 Work and Health, Unit 3.5 Evidence-based Occupational Health, Workplace Health Management, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, Berlin, 10317, Germany.
Leonie KnebelDivision 3 Work and Health, Unit 3.5 Evidence-based Occupational Health, Workplace Health Management, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, Berlin, 10317, Germany.
Claudia BuntrockInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Faculty of Medicine, Otto-Von-Guericke University Magdeburg (OVGU), Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Angelique de RijkDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Inge HoukesDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Gregor R SzycikDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hanover Medical School, Podbielskistr. 162, Hanover, OE7110, Germany.
Hans-Peter UngerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Centre for Mental Health, Asklepios Clinic Harburg, Eißendorfer Pferdeweg 52, Hamburg, 21075, Germany.
Jan Ole SchumacherDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Centre for Mental Health, Asklepios Clinic Harburg, Eißendorfer Pferdeweg 52, Hamburg, 21075, Germany.
Heiko StarkDepartment of Psychiatry, Burghof-Clinic, Ritterstr. 19, 31737, Rinteln, Germany.
Iris HauthDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Alexian St. Joseph-Hospital Berlin-Weissensee, Gartenstr. 1, 13088, Berlin, Germany.
Christian HolzapfelClinic Wittgenstein, Sählingsstr. 60, 57319, Bad Berleburg, Germany.
Anna BorgolteDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hanover Medical School, Podbielskistr. 162, Hanover, OE7110, Germany.
Carlotta SchnellerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Alexian St. Joseph-Hospital Berlin-Weissensee, Gartenstr. 1, 13088, Berlin, Germany.
Sarah-Louise UnterschemmannClinic Wittgenstein, Sählingsstr. 60, 57319, Bad Berleburg, Germany.
Wiebke PaetowDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Centre for Mental Health, Asklepios Clinic Harburg, Eißendorfer Pferdeweg 52, Hamburg, 21075, Germany.
Anna Lena JungClinic Wittgenstein, Sählingsstr. 60, 57319, Bad Berleburg, Germany.
Matthias BerkingDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Nägelsbachstr. 25a, 91052, Erlangen, Germany.
Johannes ZimmermannDepartment of Psychology, University of Kassel, Holländische Str. 36-38, 34127, Kassel, Germany.
Uta WegewitzDivision 3 Work and Health, Unit 3.5 Evidence-based Occupational Health, Workplace Health Management, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, Berlin, 10317, Germany.
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · DEAsklepios Klinikum Harburg · DEWittenstein (Germany) · DEMaastricht University · NLMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DESt. Joseph-Krankenhaus · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Kassel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental disorders (MDs) are one of the leading causes for workforce sickness absence and disability worldwide. The burden, costs and challenges are enormous for the individuals concerned, employers and society at large. Although most MDs are characterised by a high risk of relapse after treatment or by chronic courses, interventions that link medical-psychotherapeutic approaches with work-directed components to facilitate a sustainable return to work (RTW) are rare. This protocol describes the design of a study to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness and implementation process of a multimodal, clinical and work-directed intervention, called RTW-PIA, aimed at employees with MDs to achieve sustainable RTW in Germany.

methodsThe study consists of an effectiveness, a health-economic and a process evaluation, designed as a two-armed, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, conducted in German psychiatric outpatient clinics. Sick-listed employees with MDs will receive either the 18-month RTW-PIA treatment in conjunction with care as usual, or care as usual only. RTW-PIA consists of a face-to-face individual RTW support, RTW aftercare group meetings, and web-based aftercare. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after completion of baseline survey. The primary outcome is the employees´ achievement of sustainable RTW, defined as reporting less than six weeks of working days missed out due to sickness absence within 12 months after first RTW. Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life, mental functioning, RTW self-efficacy, overall job satisfaction, severity of mental illness and work ability. The health-economic evaluation will be conducted from a societal and public health care perspective, as well as from the employer's perspective in a cost-benefit analysis. The design will be supplemented by a qualitative effect evaluation using pre- and post-interviews, and a multimethod process evaluation examining various predefined key process indicators from different stakeholder perspectives. DISCUSSION: By applying a comprehensive, multimethodological evaluation design, this study captures various facets of RTW-PIA. In case of promising results for sustainable RTW, RTW-PIA may be integrated into standard care within German psychiatric outpatient clinics.

trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00026232 , 1 September 2021).

Indexed as

Mental DisordersReturn to WorkCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansJob SatisfactionMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSick LeaveMental disordersMultimodal InterventionProtocolRCTRelapse preventionReturn to workSickness absenceSRTWSustainability

Identifiers

PMID37254157
PMCPMC10228446
OpenAlexW4378781624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.