Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37254043›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Comparative analysis of whole blood transcriptomics between European and local Caribbean pigs in response to feed restriction in a tropical climate.

Nausicaa Poullet, Orianne Devarieux, David Beramice, Laurent Dantec, Yoann Félicité, Dalila Feuillet, Jean-Luc Gourdine, Jean-Christophe Bambou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nausicaa PoulletASSET, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), ²PTEA, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), 97170, France. nausicaa.poullet@inrae.fr.
Orianne DevarieuxASSET, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), ²PTEA, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), 97170, France.
David BeramicePTEA, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), 97170, France.
Laurent DantecPTEA, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), 97170, France.
Yoann FélicitéASSET, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), ²PTEA, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), 97170, France.
Dalila FeuilletASSET, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), ²PTEA, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), 97170, France.
Jean-Luc GourdineASSET, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), ²PTEA, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), 97170, France.
Jean-Christophe BambouASSET, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), ²PTEA, INRAE, Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe), 97170, France.
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRUnité de Recherche Agrosystèmes tropicaux · GP

Funding

FEDER AgroEcoDIv
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeed restriction occurs frequently during pig growth, either due to economic reasons or stressful environmental conditions. Local breeds are suggested to have better tolerance to periods of feed restriction. However, the mechanisms underlying the response to feed restriction in different breeds is largely unknown. The aims of the present study were (1) to compare the blood transcriptome profile in response to feed restriction and refeeding of two contrasted breeds, Large White (LW), which has been selected for high performance, and Creole (CR), which is adapted to tropical conditions, and (2) to investigate the effect of a moderate feed restriction and refeeding on whole blood transcriptome. Analysis of blood transcriptome allows to study the response to feed restriction and refeeding in a dynamic way. RNAseq was performed on blood samples of growing LW and CR pigs at two time points: after 3 weeks of feed restriction and after 3 weeks of refeeding. The data was compared with samples from control animals offered the same diet on an ad libitum basis throughout the whole experiment.

resultsIn terms of performance (body weight and feed efficiency), CR pigs were less impacted by feed restriction than LW. The transcriptional response to feed restriction and refeeding between CR and LW was contrasted both in terms of number of DEGs and enriched pathways. CR demonstrated a stronger transcriptional response to feed restriction whereas LW had a stronger response to refeeding. Differences in the transcriptional response to feed restriction between CR and LW were related to cell stress response (Aldosterone Signalling, Protein ubiquitination, Unfolded Protein Signalling) whereas after refeeding, differences were linked to thermogenesis, metabolic pathways and cell proliferation (p38 MAPK, ERK/MAPK pathway). In both breeds, transcriptional changes related to the immune response were found after restriction and refeeding.

conclusionsAltogether, the present study indicates that blood transcriptomics can be a useful tool to study differential genetic response to feed restriction in a dynamic way. The results indicate a differential response of blood gene expression to feed restriction and refeeding between breeds, affecting biological pathways that are in accordance with performance and thermoregulatory results.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeTropical ClimateAnimalsBody WeightCaribbean RegionGene Expression ProfilingSwineBlood transcriptomeCreole pigFeed restrictionRefeedingTropical climate

Identifiers

PMID37254043
PMCPMC10230820
OpenAlexW4378783081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.