Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37253956›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

The effect of perioperative immunonutritional support on nutritional and inflammatory status in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled study.

Gokce Gunsel-Yildirim, Kenan Can Ceylan, Derya Dikmen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The effect of immunonutritional support in patients undergoing surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for lung cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gokce Gunsel-YildirimNutrition and Diet Department, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health İzmir Provincial Health Directorate Health Sciences University Dr. Suat Seren Chest Disease and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-0391
Kenan Can CeylanThoracic Surgery Department, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health İzmir Provincial Health Directorate Health Sciences University Dr. Suat Seren Chest Disease and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0173-317X
Derya DikmenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. ddikmen@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2099-2863
Ministry of Health · TRHacettepe University · TR

Funding

TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council Of Turkey) Project no: 120S720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNutritional status is affected in patients who undergo lung cancer surgery (LCS). This study is aimed at investigating the effects of the use of immunonutritional support in the perioperative period on nutritional and inflammatory status in patients undergoing LCS.

methodsA single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted with seventy patients planning to have LCS and randomized into treatment (TG) and control groups (CG). Immunonutritional support was given orally twice a day for ten days before the operation and five days after the operation in the treatment group. The nutritional status of the patients was screened with the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA); the Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI) and the Systemic Inflammation Index (SII) were calculated. The physical activity status was assessed with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS).

resultsPost-op nutritional status of the TG patients was better than the CG group (p = 0.009). Post-operative PG-SGA score was higher than preoperative PG-SGA score in both groups (p < 0.001). In the post-operative period, nutritional status (in terms of PG-SGA score category) in the patients in the TG was better than the CG (p = 0.046). In both groups, post-op ECOG score was higher than the pre-op ECOG score (p < 0.001). Post-op physical performance status was found to be better in the TG compared to the CG (p = 0.001). PNI level decreased statistically and significantly in the post-op period compared to the pre-op period, SII levels increased.

conclusionPatients who will undergo LCS should be supported in terms of immunonutrition starting from the preoperative period.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsNutritional StatusHumansNutrition AssessmentProspective StudiesResearch DesignImmunonutritionInflammationLung cancer surgeryNutritional statusPhysical performance

Identifiers

PMID37253956
OpenAlexW4378783004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.