ReviewGenes & genomics2023
Getting the chronological age out of DNA: using insights of age-dependent DNA methylation for forensic DNA applications.
Review in Genes & genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital PCR in forensic genetics: principles, applications, and challenges.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Immunohistological detection of pentosidine in the epiglottis:A contribution to molecular age estimation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular Age Estimation: Current Perspectives and Future Considerations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Examining Epigenetic Age in Women with Different Obesity Conditions Using DNA Methylation at theMethods and protocols · 2026Article
- Improved epigenetic age prediction models by combining sex chromosome and autosomal markers.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Article
- A Ge.F.I. Collaborative Study: Evaluating Reproducibility and Accuracy of a DNA-Methylation-Based Age-Predictive Assay for Routine Implementation in Forensic Casework.Electrophoresis · 2025Article
- Molecular age prediction using skull bone samples from individuals with and without signs of decomposition: a multivariate approach combining analysis of posttranslational protein modifications and DNA methylation.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- MinLinMo: a minimalist approach to variable selection and linear model prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Special Issue "Molecular Biology in Forensic Science: Past, Present and Future".International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Current issues in forensic genetics.Genes & genomics · 2023Article
- Preliminary exploratory research on the application value of oral and intestinal meta-genomics in predicting subjects' occupations-A case study of the distinction between students and migrant workers.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- DNA Methylation in Cancer: Epigenetic View of Dietary and Lifestyle Factors.Epigenetics insights · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA analysis for forensic investigations has a long tradition with important developments and optimizations since its first application. Traditionally, short tandem repeats analysis has been the most powerful method for the identification of individuals. However, in addition, epigenetic changes, i.e., DNA methylation, came into focus of forensic DNA research. Chronological age prediction is one promising application to allow for narrowing the pool of possible individuals who caused a trace, as well as to support the identification of unknown bodies and for age verification of living individuals.
objectiveThis review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge, possibilities, and (current) limitations about DNA methylation-based chronological age prediction with emphasis on forensic application.
methodsThe development, implementation and application of age prediction tools requires a deep understanding about the biological background, the analysis methods, the age-dependent DNA methylation markers, as well as the mathematical models for age prediction and their evaluation. Furthermore, additional influences can have an impact. Therefore, the literature was evaluated in respect to these diverse topics.
conclusionThe numerous research efforts in recent years have led to a rapid change in our understanding of the application of DNA methylation for chronological age prediction, which is now on the way to implementation and validation. Knowledge of the various aspects leads to a better understanding and allows a more informed interpretation of DNAm quantification results, as well as the obtained results by the age prediction tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.