Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37253899›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2023

Prescribed and Penalized: The Detrimental Impact of Mandated Reporting for Prenatal Utilization of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.

Erin C Work, Serra Muftu, Kathryn Dee L MacMillan, Jessica R Gray, Nicole Bell, Mishka Terplan, Hendree E Jones, Julia Reddy, Timothy E Wilens, Shelly F Greenfield and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Do No Harm? Rethinking Urine Drug Screens in Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Substance use and use disorders during pregnancy and the postpartum period.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Erin C WorkDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, MassGeneral for Children, 125 Nashua St Suite 860, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. erincwork@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-6542
Serra MuftuDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, MassGeneral for Children, 125 Nashua St Suite 860, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Kathryn Dee L MacMillanDivision of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Jessica R GrayDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Nicole BellLiving in Freedom Together-LIFT Inc, Worcester, MA, USA.
Mishka TerplanFriends Research Institute, 1040 Park Ave, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.
Hendree E JonesUNC Horizons and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 410 North Greensboro St., Carrboro, NC, USA.
Julia ReddyGillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Timothy E WilensDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Shelly F GreenfieldDivision of Women's Mental Health and Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA.
Judith BernsteinDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Davida M SchiffDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, MassGeneral for Children, 125 Nashua St Suite 860, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USBoston University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USFreedom House · USFriends Research Institute · USHarvard University · USUCLA Health · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Career Development Program in Substance Use and Addiction MedicineK12DA043490 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI A EDEN EVINS, NANCY A RIGOTTI · 2017 to 2026
$4.7M
Does Treating Young Persons Psychopathology Prevent the Onset of Opioid and other Substance Use Disorders?UH3DA050252 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WILENS, TIMOTHY E, YULE, AMY · 2020 to 2020
$3.0M
Improving Treatment Engagement and Adherence to Optimize Outcomes for Opioid-Exposed Mother-Infant DyadsK23DA048169 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHIFF, DAVIDA · 2019 to 2023
$998k
NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA043490NIDA NIH HHS K12DA043490NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA048169NIDA NIH HHS K23DA048169NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA050252NIDA NIH HHS UH3DA050252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSome states, including Massachusetts, require automatic filing of child abuse and neglect for substance-exposed newborns, including infants exposed in-utero to clinician-prescribed medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD). The aim of this article is to explore effects of these mandated reporting policies on pregnant and postpartum people receiving MOUD.

methodsWe used modified grounded research theory, literature findings, and constant comparative methods to extract, analyze and contextualize perinatal experiences with child protection systems (CPS) and explore the impact of the Massachusetts mandated reporting policy on healthcare experiences and OUD treatment decisions. We drew from 26 semi-structured interviews originally conducted within a parent study of perinatal MOUD use in pregnancy and the postpartum period.

resultsThree themes unique to CPS reporting policies and involvement emerged. First, mothers who received MOUD during pregnancy identified mandated reporting for prenatally prescribed medication utilization as unjust and stigmatizing. Second, the stress caused by an impending CPS filing at delivery and the realities of CPS surveillance and involvement after filing were both perceived as harmful to family health and wellbeing. Finally, pregnant and postpartum individuals with OUD felt pressure to make medical decisions in a complex environment in which medical recommendations and the requirements of CPS agencies often compete. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Uncoupling of OUD treatment decisions in the perinatal period from mandated CPS reporting at time of delivery is essential. The primary focus for families affected by OUD must shift from surveillance and stigma to evidence-based treatment and access to supportive services and resources.

Indexed as

Child AbuseOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMassachusettsMothersOpiate Substitution TreatmentPostpartum PeriodPregnancyAnalgesics, OpioidChild protection systemsMandated reportingMedications to treat opioid use disorderPerinatal opioid use disorderSubstance-exposed newborns

Identifiers

PMID37253899
PMCPMC10229393
OpenAlexW4378783697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.