Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37253839›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Acidified biochar improves lead tolerance and enhances morphological and biochemical attributes of mint in saline soil.

Azhar Sohail Shahzad, Uzma Younis, Nargis Naz, Subhan Danish, Asad Syed, Abdallah M Elgorban, Rajalakshmanan Eswaramoorthy, Shoucheng Huang, Martin Leonardo Battaglia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Azhar Sohail ShahzadBotany Department, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Uzma YounisBotany Department, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. uzma.younis@iub.edu.pk.
Nargis NazBotany Department, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Subhan DanishDepartment of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. sd96850@gmail.com.
Asad SyedDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Abdallah M ElgorbanDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Rajalakshmanan EswaramoorthyDepartment of Biochemistry, Centre of Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics (COMMAND), Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, 600077, India.
Shoucheng HuangCollege of Life and Health Science, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, 233100, China.
Martin Leonardo BattagliaThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, 22203, USA.
Islamia University of Bahawalpur · PKKing Saud University · SAAnhui University of Science and Technology · CNBahauddin Zakariya University · PKSaveetha University · INThe Nature Conservancy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lead (Pb) toxicity is a significant environmental issue, especially in areas with a past of industrial activities and mining. The existence of Pb in the soil can have negative impacts on plant growth and development, and it can also pose a risk to human health through the food chain. Acidified carbon has shown promise as an effective management technology for mitigating Pb toxicity. This study provides important insights into the potential of acidified biochar as a low-cost and eco-friendly method for managing Pb-contaminated soils. The current study explores the effectiveness of acidified biochar (AB) in alleviating Pb stress in mint. The study involved two levels of Pb (0 = control and 200 mg/kg Pb) and four levels of AB as treatments (0, 0.45, 0.90, and 1.20%). Results indicate that 1.20% AB was the most effective treatment, significantly decreasing root and shoot Pb concentration while enhancing shoot and root fresh and dry weight, shoot and root length, and shoot and root N, P, and K concentration. Moreover, a significant decrease in MDA (0.45AB, 0.90AB, and 1.20AB caused a decline in MDA content by 14.3%, 27.8%, and 40.2%, respectively) and an increase in ascorbic acid (0.45AB, 0.90AB, and 1.20AB led to an increase in ascorbic acid content of 1.9%, 24.8%, and 28.4%, respectively) validated the effectiveness of 1.20% AB compared to the control. Adding 0.45AB, 0.90AB, and 1.20AB led to an increase in soluble sugar content of 15.6%, 27.5%, and 32.1%, respectively, compared to the treatment without AB. Further investigations at the field level are suggested to confirm the efficacy of 1.20% AB as the best treatment against Pb toxicity in saline soil conditions.

Indexed as

MenthaSoil PollutantsAscorbic AcidCharcoalHumansLeadSaline SolutionSoilAscorbic AcidbiocharCharcoalLeadSaline SolutionSoilSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID37253839
PMCPMC10229572
OpenAlexW4378781650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.