Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37253631›Full record

ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2023

Joint British Societies' position statement on bullying, harassment and discrimination in cardiology.

Christian Fielder Camm, Abhishek Joshi, Helen Eftekhari, Rachael O'Flynn, Rebecca Dobson, Nick Curzen, Guy Lloyd, John Pierre Greenwood, Christopher Allen

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. From structures to systems: towards a model of ethical healthcare.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mentorship for cardiology trainees: appealing or appalling?The British journal of cardiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Christian Fielder CammKeble College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK cfcamm@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2122-4225
Abhishek JoshiBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Helen EftekhariCardiology Department, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7140-7180
Rachael O'FlynnBritish Cardiovascular Society, London, UK.
Rebecca DobsonCardiology Department, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5399-6030
Nick CurzenCoronary Research Group, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9651-7829
Guy LloydBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
John Pierre GreenwoodCardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2861-0914
Christopher AllenGuy's & St Thomas' Hospital, King's College, Rayne Institute, London, UK.
St Bartholomew's Hospital · GBBritish Cardiovascular Society · GBRoyal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/20/1/34946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inappropriate behaviour is an umbrella term including discrimination, harassment and bullying. This includes both actions and language and can affect any member of the cardiovascular workforce/team. Evidence has suggested that such behaviour is regularly experienced within UK cardiology departments, where inappropriate behaviour may represent longstanding cultural and practice issues within the unit. Inappropriate behaviour has negative effects on the workforce community as a whole, including impacts on recruitment and retention of staff and patient care. While only some members of the cardiology team may be directly impacted by inappropriate behaviour in individual departments, a wider group are significantly impacted as bystanders. As such, improving the culture and professional behaviours within UK cardiology departments is of paramount importance. As a negative workplace culture is felt to be a major driver of inappropriate behaviour, all members of the cardiovascular team have a role to play in ensuring a positive workplace culture is developed. Episodes of inappropriate behaviour should be challenged by cardiovascular team members. Informal feedback may be appropriate where 'one-off' episodes of inappropriate behaviour occur, but serious events or repeated behaviour should be escalated following formal human resources protocols.

Indexed as

BullyingCardiologyHumansWorkplaceDelivery of Health CareEducation, MedicalOrganizational ObjectivesQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID37253631
PMCPMC10359534
OpenAlexW4378781555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.