Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37253489›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2023

Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme: a prospective analysis in the Genetics and Vascular Health Check (GENVASC) study.

Radoslaw Debiec, Daniel Lawday, Vasiliki Bountziouka, Emma Beeston, Chris Greengrass, Richard Bramley, Sue Sehmi, Shireen Kharodia, Michelle Newton, Andrea Marshall and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04417387 (Genetics and Vascular Health Check Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04417387 recruitingnot on this map

Genetics and Vascular Health Check Study (GENVASC)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of LeicesterRan2012 to 2027Enrolled30,000ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsObservational
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Radoslaw DebiecDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK rmd24@leicester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2292-467X
Daniel LawdayDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Vasiliki BountzioukaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Emma BeestonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Chris GreengrassDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Richard BramleyDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sue SehmiDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Shireen KharodiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Michelle NewtonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Andrea MarshallDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Andre KrzeminskiAlbany House Medical Centre, Wellingborough, UK.
Azhar ZafarDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Anuj ChahalSouth Leicestershire Medical Group, Kibworth Beauchamp, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5664-4487
Amardeep HeerLakeside Healthcare Research, Corby, UK.
Kamlesh KhuntiDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Nitin JoshiWillowbrook Medical Centre, Leicester, UK.
Mayur LakhaniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Azhar FarooqiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Riyaz PatelInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4603-2393
Nilesh J SamaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester · GBAlbany House Medical Centre · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/14/76/30933Department of Health BRC-1215-20010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of the national cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention programme-National Health Service Health Check (NHSHC) in reduction of CVD risk.

designProspective cohort study.

setting147 primary care practices in Leicestershire and Northamptonshire in England, UK.

participants27 888 individuals undergoing NHSHC with a minimum of 18 months of follow-up data. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were NHSHC attributed detection of CVD risk factors, prescription of medications, changes in values of individual risk factors and frequency of follow-up.

resultsAt recruitment, 18% of participants had high CVD risk (10%-20% 10-year risk) and 4% very high CVD risk (>20% 10-year risk). New diagnoses or hypertension (HTN) was made in 2.3% participants, hypercholesterolaemia in 0.25% and diabetes mellitus in 0.9%. New prescription of stains and antihypertensive medications was observed in 5.4% and 5.4% of participants, respectively. Total cholesterol was decreased on average by 0.38 mmol/L (95% CI -0.34 to -0.41) and 1.71 mmol/L (-1.48 to -1.94) in patients with initial cholesterol >5 mmol/L and >7.5 mmol/L, respectively. Systolic blood pressure was decreased on average by 2.9 mm Hg (-2.3 to -3.7), 15.7 mm Hg (-14.1 to -17.5) and 33.4 mm Hg (-29.4 to -37.7), in patients with grade 1, 2 and 3 HTN, respectively. About one out of three patients with increased CVD risk had no record of follow-up or treatment.

conclusionsMajority of patients identified with increased CVD risk through the NHSHC were followed up and received effective clinical interventions. However, one-third of high CVD risk patients had no follow-up and therefore did not receive any treatment. Our study highlights areas of focus which could improve the effectiveness of the programme. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04417387.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionCholesterolHumansProspective StudiesRisk FactorsState MedicineTreatment OutcomeCholesterolcardiologyhealth policypreventive medicineprimary prevention

Identifiers

PMID37253489
PMCPMC10230936
OpenAlexW4378781959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.