Opening up mental health research.

Isabel O L Bacellar, Geneviève Morin, Sylvanne Daniels, Gustavo Turecki, Lena Palaniyappan, Martin Lepage

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

3citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

Long-Term Trajectories of Multidimensional Outcomes in Psychosis Following Early Intervention During the Critical Period: The PEPP-Montreal 10+ Study Protocol.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026
Article
Latent Trajectories of Positive, Negative Symptoms and Functioning in Early Intervention Services for First-Episode Psychosis: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025
Article
Implementing Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) Principles in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Research: Mixed Methods Approach.JMIR mental health · 2024
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabel O L BacellarFrom the Douglas Research Centre, Montréal, Que. (Bacellar, Morin, Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage); the Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, Montréal, Que. (Morin); the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage).

Geneviève MorinFrom the Douglas Research Centre, Montréal, Que. (Bacellar, Morin, Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage); the Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, Montréal, Que. (Morin); the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage).

Sylvanne DanielsFrom the Douglas Research Centre, Montréal, Que. (Bacellar, Morin, Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage); the Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, Montréal, Que. (Morin); the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage).

Gustavo TureckiFrom the Douglas Research Centre, Montréal, Que. (Bacellar, Morin, Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage); the Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, Montréal, Que. (Morin); the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage).

Lena PalaniyappanFrom the Douglas Research Centre, Montréal, Que. (Bacellar, Morin, Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage); the Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, Montréal, Que. (Morin); the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage).

Martin LepageFrom the Douglas Research Centre, Montréal, Que. (Bacellar, Morin, Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage); the Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, Montréal, Que. (Morin); the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Daniels, Turecki, Palaniyappan, Lepage) martin.lepage@mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open science provides a compelling framework for accelerating global collaborations and enabling discoveries to understand and treat mental health disorders. Herein, we discuss the advantages and obstacles to adopting open science in mental health research, considering the particularities of sensitive and diverse data types, the potential of co-designing projects with research participants and the opportunity of amplifying open science by integration with mental health care. We present a practical example of how this landscape may be navigated to adopt open science across an entire research centre, in 5 steps, namely leadership committing to open science; finding models, resources and allies; identifying needs; defining open science principles; and putting principles into practice. We derive lessons learned that can be built upon by researchers and research organizations joining the open science movement in mental health.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthHumans

Identifiers

PMID37253483

DOI10.1503/jpn.220199

PMCPMC10234619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.