Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37253426›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Multivariate mapping of ontogeny, taphonomy and phylogeny to reconstruct problematic fossil taxa.

Jane C Reeves, Robert S Sansom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jane C ReevesDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4848-8271
Robert S SansomDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1926-2556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exceptionally preserved fossils of soft-bodied organisms provide unique evidence of evolutionary history, but they are often contentious; different approaches frequently produce radically different reconstructions of taxa and their affinities. Conflict arises due to difficulties in disentangling the three non-independent factors that underlie all morphological variation within and between fossils: ontogeny, taphonomy and phylogeny. Comparative data from extant organisms can be extremely powerful in this context, but is often difficult to apply given the multi-dimensionality of anatomical variation. Here, we present a multivariate ordination method using discrete morphological character data from modern taxa at different ontogenetic and taphonomic stages (semaphoront and 'semataphonts'). Analysing multiple axes of morphological variation simultaneously allows us to visualize character combinations that are likely to exist in fossil specimens at intersecting stages of growth and decay, and thus constrain interpretation of fossils. Application to early vertebrates finds variation in fossil specimens to be accounted for by all three axes: primarily decay in

Indexed as

FossilsPaleontologyAnimalsBiological EvolutionMorphogenesisPhylogenyearly vertebratesfossilnon-metric multidimensional scalingontogenysoft-tissuetaphonomy

Identifiers

PMID37253426
PMCPMC10229227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.