Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37253369›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023

[General Practitioners' Experiences with COVID-19: a Survey After the First Wave of the Pandemic in March/April 2020].

Hanna Schrader, Gábor Borgulya, Sandra Parisi, Stefanie Joos, Hanna Kaduszkiewicz, Anne Barzel, Christina Raus, Linda Sanftenberg, Thomas Kühlein, Andy Maun and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna SchraderInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Gábor BorgulyaInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sandra ParisiInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefanie JoosInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hanna KaduszkiewiczInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Anne BarzelInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Christina RausAbteilung Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Linda SanftenbergInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universitat München, München, Germany.
Thomas KühleinAllgemeinmedizinisches Institut, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Andy MaunInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Julia SchmidtInstitut für klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Klaus LindeInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2902-970X
Ildikó GágyorInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (Mar-Apr 2020) posed significant challenges for primary care. The goal of this study was to analyse the burden of the crisis situation as experienced by the general practitioners (GPs) at its beginning and over the course of the pandemic and to identify factors predictive of the sense of being overburdened.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, a total of 6300 randomly selected GPs in four federal states of Germany were contacted per post in order to survey changes in health care they provided and their psychological burden in the context of the pandemic between August and October 2020.

resultsThe response rate was 23%; 46% of the participants were female. At the beginning of the pandemic, 40% of the participants experienced a high or a very high level of being overburdened; later on, it was only 10%. With increasing numbers of COVID patients, the sense of being overburdened increased, as also their perceived capability to care for COVID patients. Predictors of a sense of being overburdened were, among others, a high level of psychological stress, excessive organising efforts, poor capability to care for COVID patients, and scarce supply of protective equipment.

conclusionDespite a sense of being overburdened initially, GPs felt increasingly capable of caring for COVID patients. To help GPs in future crisis situations like this pandemic, organization of care should be simplified to the extent possible so that they can focus on patient care.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PractitionersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMalePandemics

Identifiers

PMID37253369
PMCPMC11248413
OpenAlexW4378782215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.