ArticleAccident; analysis and prevention2023
Informing traffic enforcement leniency and discretion: Crash culpability and the effectiveness of written warnings versus citations.
Article in Accident; analysis and prevention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDeterrence of risky driving behavior is important for the prevention of crashes and injuries. Traffic law enforcement is a key strategy used to decrease risky driving, but there is little evidence on the deterrent effect of issuing warnings versus citations to drivers regarding the prevention of future crashes. The purpose of this study was to 1) investigate the difference between citations and written warnings in their association with future crash culpability and 2) investigate whether drivers who were issued written warnings or citations have different associations with future crash culpability likelihood than those without prior citations or written warnings.
methodsData for this study included Iowa Department of Transportation crash data for 2016 to 2019 linked to data from the Iowa Court Case Management System. A quasi-induced exposure method was used based on driver pairs involved in the same collision in which one driver was deemed culpable and one was non-culpable. Conditional logistic regression models were constructed to examine predictors of crash culpability. The main independent variable was traffic citation and warnings history categorized into moving warning, non-moving warning, moving citation, non-moving citation, or no citation or warning in the 30 days prior to the crash.
resultsThe study sample included a total of 152,986 drivers. Among drivers with moving violations, previously cited drivers were more likely to be crash culpable than previously warned drivers (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.29-2.08). Drivers with prior non-moving citations were less likely to be the culpable party in a crash than a driver who had no recent warnings or citations (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.58-0.89). Drivers with prior warnings (moving or non-moving) did not appreciably differ in crash culpability relative to drivers who had not received any citations or warnings in the previous 30 days.
conclusionsDrivers with prior moving citations were more likely to be culpable in a future crash than drivers with prior moving warnings, which may relate to overall driving riskiness as opposed to effectiveness of citations in deterring risky driving behaviors. Results from this study also suggest that officer discretion was being appropriately applied by citing the riskiest drivers, while giving lower risk drivers warnings. Results from this study may be useful to support strengthening of state driver improvement programming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.