Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37253074›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Tight basis cycle representatives for persistent homology of large biological data sets.

Manu Aggarwal, Vipul Periwal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manu AggarwalLaboratory of Biological Modeling/NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8262-9341
Vipul PeriwalLaboratory of Biological Modeling/NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Computing persistent homology in biological datasetsZIADK075161 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI PERIWAL, VIPUL · 2021 to 2025
$949k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK075161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent homology (PH) is a popular tool for topological data analysis that has found applications across diverse areas of research. It provides a rigorous method to compute robust topological features in discrete experimental observations that often contain various sources of uncertainties. Although powerful in theory, PH suffers from high computation cost that precludes its application to large data sets. Additionally, most analyses using PH are limited to computing the existence of nontrivial features. Precise localization of these features is not generally attempted because, by definition, localized representations are not unique and because of even higher computation cost. Such a precise location is a sine qua non for determining functional significance, especially in biological applications. Here, we provide a strategy and algorithms to compute tight representative boundaries around nontrivial robust features in large data sets. To showcase the efficiency of our algorithms and the precision of computed boundaries, we analyze the human genome and protein crystal structures. In the human genome, we found a surprising effect of the impairment of chromatin loop formation on loops through chromosome 13 and the sex chromosomes. We also found loops with long-range interactions between functionally related genes. In protein homologs with significantly different topology, we found voids attributable to ligand-interaction, mutation, and differences between species.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsGenome, HumanHumansProteins

Identifiers

PMID37253074
PMCPMC10275456
OpenAlexW4378783772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.