ArticleACS chemical biology2023
Rational Design of Chemically Controlled Antibodies and Protein Therapeutics.
Article in ACS chemical biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-controlled CAR T cells through the regulation of cell-cell interactions.Nature chemical biology · 2026Article
- Beyond ER-Golgi trafficking: unconventional protein secretion as a new design frontier for synthetic secretion switches in mammalian cells.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Identification of affinity-optimized peptide binders of a viral protease for chemical genetic applications.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Conditionally Activatable Antibody Platforms: Mechanisms, Modalities, and Clinical Translation Potential.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Review
- Ligand-induced assembly of antibody variable fragments for the chemical regulation of biological processes.Cell chemical biology · 2025Article
- Article
- A novel strategy to generate immunocytokines with activity-on-demand using small molecule inhibitors.EMBO molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Tumor-Homing Antibody-Cytokine Fusions for Cancer Therapy.OncoTargets and therapy · 2024Review
- Rational design of small-molecule responsive protein switches.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-based therapeutics, such as monoclonal antibodies and cytokines, are important therapies for various pathophysiological conditions such as oncology, autoimmune disorders, and viral infections. However, the wide application of such protein therapeutics is often hindered by dose-limiting toxicities and adverse effects, namely, cytokine storm syndrome, organ failure, and others. Therefore, spatiotemporal control of the activities of these proteins is crucial to further expand their application. Here, we report the design and application of small-molecule-controlled switchable protein therapeutics by taking advantage of a previously engineered OFF-switch system. We used the Rosetta modeling suite to computationally optimize the affinity between B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) protein and a previously developed computationally designed protein partner (LD3) to obtain a fast and efficient heterodimer disruption upon the addition of a competing drug (Venetoclax). The incorporation of the engineered OFF-switch system into anti-CTLA4, anti-HER2 antibodies, or an Fc-fused IL-15 cytokine demonstrated an efficient disruption in vitro, as well as fast clearance in vivo upon the addition of the competing drug Venetoclax. These results provide a proof-of-concept for the rational design of controllable biologics by introducing a drug-induced OFF-switch into existing protein-based therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.