Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37252738›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Factors Associated With Cognitive Improvement After Bariatric Surgery Among Patients With Severe Obesity in the Netherlands.

Debby Vreeken, Florine Seidel, Emma M Custers, Lisette Olsthoorn, Sophie Cools, Edo O Aarts, Robert Kleemann, Roy P C Kessels, Maximilian Wiesmann, Eric J Hazebroek and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Depressive symptoms at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up after bariatric surgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Debby VreekenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Anatomy, and Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Center for Medical Neuroscience, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Florine SeidelDepartment of Medical Imaging, Anatomy, and Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Center for Medical Neuroscience, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Emma M CustersDepartment of Medical Imaging, Anatomy, and Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Center for Medical Neuroscience, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Lisette OlsthoornDepartment of Medical Imaging, Anatomy, and Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Center for Medical Neuroscience, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Sophie CoolsDepartment of Medical Imaging, Anatomy, and Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Center for Medical Neuroscience, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Edo O AartsDepartment of Surgery, WeightWorks Clinics, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Robert KleemannDepartment of Metabolic Health Research, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Roy P C KesselsDepartment of Medical Psychology and Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Maximilian WiesmannDepartment of Medical Imaging, Anatomy, and Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Center for Medical Neuroscience, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Eric J HazebroekDepartment of Bariatric Surgery, Vitalys, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Amanda J KiliaanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Anatomy, and Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Center for Medical Neuroscience, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Bariatric surgery-induced weight loss is often associated with improved cognitive function. However, improvement in cognitive function is not always exhibited by all patients, and the mechanisms behind cognitive improvement remain unknown. Objective: To investigate the association of changes in adipokines, inflammatory factors, mood, and physical activity with alterations in cognitive function after bariatric surgery among patients with severe obesity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included 156 patients with severe obesity (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], >35) eligible for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, aged between 35 and 55 years, who were enrolled in the BARICO (Bariatric Surgery Rijnstate and Radboudumc Neuroimaging and Cognition in Obesity) study between September 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. Follow-up was completed July 31, 2021; 146 participants completed the 6-month follow-up and were included in the analysis. Intervention: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall cognitive performance (based on a 20% change index of the compound z score), inflammatory factors (eg, C-reactive protein and interleukin 6 levels), adipokines (eg, leptin and adiponectin levels), mood (assessed via the Beck Depression Inventory), and physical activity (assessed with the Baecke questionnaire). Results: A total of 146 patients (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [5.7] years; 124 women [84.9%]) completed the 6-month follow-up and were included. After bariatric surgery, all plasma levels of inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (median change, -0.32 mg/dL [IQR, -0.57 to -0.16 mg/dL]; P < .001) and leptin (median change, -51.5 pg/mL [IQR, -68.0 to -38.4 pg/mL]; P < .001), were lower, whereas adiponectin levels were higher (median change, 0.15 μg/mL [IQR, -0.20 to 0.62 µg/mL]; P < .001), depressive symptoms were (partly) resolved (median change in Beck Depression Inventory score, -3 [IQR, -6 to 0]; P < .001), and physical activity level was higher (mean [SD] change in Baecke score, 0.7 [1.1]; P < .001). Cognitive improvement was observed in 43.8% (57 of 130) of the participants overall. This group had lower C-reactive protein (0.11 vs 0.24 mg/dL; P = .04) and leptin levels (11.8 vs 14.5 pg/mL; P = .04) and fewer depressive symptoms at 6 months (4 vs 5; P = .045) compared with the group of participants who did not show cognitive improvement. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that lower C-reactive protein and leptin levels, as well as fewer depressive symptoms, might partly explain the mechanisms behind cognitive improvement after bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidAdipokinesAdiponectinAdultCohort StudiesC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansLeptinMiddle AgedNetherlandsObesityAdipokinesAdiponectinC-Reactive ProteinLeptin

Identifiers

PMID37252738
PMCPMC10230316
OpenAlexW4378746303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.