Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37252618›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2023

Using tele-ultrasound to teach medical students: A randomised control equivalence study.

Renee T Zhao, Jasmine Deng, Ghadi Ghanem, Athreya Steiger, Lara Tang, David Haase, Sima E Sadeghinejad, Jacqueline Shibata, Alan T Chiem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. POCUS is everywhere.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Renee T ZhaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5627-4241
Jasmine DengDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.
Ghadi GhanemDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.
Athreya SteigerDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.
Lara TangDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.
David HaaseDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.
Sima E SadeghinejadDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.
Jacqueline ShibataDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.
Alan T ChiemDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2243-1915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Undergraduate ultrasound education is becoming increasingly important, but its expansion is limited by time, space and the availability of trained faculty. In order to validate an alternative and more accessible teaching model, our aim was to assess whether combining teleguidance and peer-assisted learning to teach ultrasound is as effective as traditional in-person methods. Methods: Peer instructors taught 47 second-year medical students ocular ultrasound Results: The teleguidance group performed as well as the traditional in-person group in terms of knowledge change, confidence change, OSCE time and OSCE score (p = 0.011, p = 0.006, p = 0.005 and  = 0.004, respectively, indicating the two groups are statistically equivalent). The teleguidance group rated the experience highly overall (4.06/5), but less than the traditional group (4.47/5; P = 0.448, indicating statistical difference). Peer instruction was rated 4.35/5 overall. Conclusion: Peer-instructed teleguidance was equivalent to in-person instruction with respect to knowledge change, confidence gain and OSCE performance in basic ocular ultrasound.

Indexed as

medical educationocular ultrasoundpeer‐assisted learningremote learningteleguidance

Identifiers

PMID37252618
PMCPMC10225007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.