ArticleCureus2023
Causes of Dorsal Cutaneous Branch of the Ulnar Nerve Neuropathy Among Patients Undergoing Electrodiagnostic Studies: A Series of 14 Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrodiagnostic Assessment of Peri-Procedural Iatrogenic Peripheral Nerve Injuries and Rehabilitation.Muscle & nerve · 2025Review
- An intraneural ganglion cyst of the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve arising from the wrist: support for the articular origin. Illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve conduction study based on nerve ultrasound.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Treatment of the Distal Forearm Fracture by Volar Dual Window Approach.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIsolated neuropathy of the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve (DCBUN) is rare and most cases are secondary to trauma, often iatrogenic. The topography of sensory abnormalities and abnormal electrodiagnostic (EDX) findings are crucial in confirming DCBUN neuropathy. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with isolated involvement of the DCBUN from among patients referred for EDX studies for upper extremity symptoms. All patients underwent a focused neurological examination followed by EDX studies. Ultrasound (US) studies were performed in two patients. Results: Of the 14 patients with DCBUN neuropathy, decreased pinprick sensation in the distribution of the DCBUN was noted in 11 (78%) patients. DCBUN sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) was not recordable in 13 (92%) patients. In one patient who had a recordable SNAP, the latency was prolonged, and the amplitude was decreased. Four (28%) patients had incidental EDX abnormalities suggestive of entrapment of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel. The most common cause of DCBUN neuropathy was trauma in 13 (92%) patients, of which eight were iatrogenic. No specific etiology was detected in one patient (7%). Of the two patients who underwent US studies, one had increased cross-sectional area (CSA) at the wrist with prominent fascicles and hyperechoic scar tissue, while the CSA was normal in the other patient.
conclusionsAlthough rare, DCBUN neuropathy can be readily confirmed by typical clinical features and EDX findings. Surgeons should be aware of the anatomy and clinical features of DCBUN neuropathy and avoid injuring the nerve during surgical procedures at the wrist and forearm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.